These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2709821)

  • 21. Scientific evidence in the courtroom. The death of the Frye rule.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 1994 Apr; 330(14):1018-21. PubMed ID: 8121456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Should expert testimony be required in disciplinary proceedings against dentists accused of malpractice or incompetency?
    Morris WO
    J Law Ethics Dent; 1989; 2(3-4):143-8. PubMed ID: 2640234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating neurosurgical testimony by non-neurosurgeons: case studies.
    Watts C
    Surg Neurol; 2009 Apr; 71(4):510-1. PubMed ID: 18482763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ethical guidelines for expert medical witnesses.
    Hendricks WM
    N C Med J; 1989 Jul; 50(7):378-9. PubMed ID: 2755516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Peer review: is testifying worth the hassle?
    Owens A
    Med Econ; 1984 Aug; 61(17):167-9, 172-3. PubMed ID: 10267460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The latest word on confidentiality of peer review.
    Cronan CJ
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1998 Dec; 96(12):491-3. PubMed ID: 9879179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Are peer review decisions still binding?
    Power JM
    N Y State Dent J; 1991; 57(7):26-7. PubMed ID: 1923144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hospital sued for corporate negligence, court rules on discovery of records.
    Mudron MD
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(20):7-8. PubMed ID: 10278590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Immunity protections for peer review.
    Wilcox DP
    Tex Med; 1982 May; 78(5):72-3. PubMed ID: 7101208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Setting the standard.
    Nursing; 1996 Dec; 26(12):62. PubMed ID: 8971248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Resident files and the peer review privilege.
    Weiman DS; Mangiante E
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 2009 Aug; 94(8):16-8. PubMed ID: 19715000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Peer Review. Can the Board of Medical Practice subpoena your files?
    Mitchell LE; Bunde DP; Struthers MS; Wraspir KL; Moos RE
    Minn Med; 2000 Nov; 83(11):55-6. PubMed ID: 11126484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laws vary on use of peer review records in litigation.
    Berliner MC
    Provider; 1987 May; 13(5):44, 46. PubMed ID: 10281935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The geographical restrictions on expert testimony in medical malpractice cases in Virginia.
    Med Leg Bull; 1985; 34(5):1-10. PubMed ID: 4069071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Physician peer review. Serving the patient or the physician?
    Cate MJ
    J Leg Med; 1999 Dec; 20(4):479-506. PubMed ID: 10641461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Protected peer review.
    Cosgrove MJ
    Del Med J; 1988 Jun; 60(6):349. PubMed ID: 3396739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Friend of the court.
    Tex Med; 1997 Jul; 93(7):24-6. PubMed ID: 9226986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Malpractice expert witness statute held.
    Weber RD
    Mich Med; 1999 Oct; 98(10):8-9. PubMed ID: 10561984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Malpractice expert witness statute held constitutional.
    Weber RD
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 81(8):14, 44. PubMed ID: 11816091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Disciplinary action by North Carolina Medical Board reversed.
    Summers JB; Kaminski J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1716; author reply 1716. PubMed ID: 14627604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.