258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27098235)
1. Health state descriptions, valuations and individuals' capacity to walk: a comparative evaluation of preference-based instruments in the context of spinal cord injury.
Whitehurst DGT; Mittmann N; Noonan VK; Dvorak MF; Bryan S
Qual Life Res; 2016 Oct; 25(10):2481-2496. PubMed ID: 27098235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. "When I saw walking I just kind of took it as wheeling": interpretations of mobility-related items in generic, preference-based health state instruments in the context of spinal cord injury.
Michel YA; Engel L; Rand-Hendriksen K; Augestad LA; Whitehurst DG
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Nov; 14(1):164. PubMed ID: 27894349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Framing of mobility items: a source of poor agreement between preference-based health-related quality of life instruments in a population of individuals receiving assisted ventilation.
Hannan LM; Whitehurst DGT; Bryan S; Road JD; McDonald CF; Berlowitz DJ; Howard ME
Qual Life Res; 2017 Jun; 26(6):1493-1505. PubMed ID: 28255744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A review of preference-based health-related quality of life questionnaires in spinal cord injury research.
Whitehurst DG; Noonan VK; Dvorak MF; Bryan S
Spinal Cord; 2012 Sep; 50(9):646-54. PubMed ID: 22641255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptions of individuals living with spinal cord injury toward preference-based quality of life instruments: a qualitative exploration.
Whitehurst DG; Suryaprakash N; Engel L; Mittmann N; Noonan VK; Dvorak MF; Bryan S
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Apr; 12():50. PubMed ID: 24731409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D responses using scoring algorithms derived from similar valuation exercises.
Whitehurst DG; Norman R; Brazier JE; Viney R
Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):570-7. PubMed ID: 25128050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using path analysis to investigate the relationships between standardized instruments that measure health-related quality of life, capability wellbeing and subjective wellbeing: An application in the context of spinal cord injury.
Engel L; Bryan S; Noonan VK; Whitehurst DGT
Soc Sci Med; 2018 Sep; 213():154-164. PubMed ID: 30081357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of depression on health-related quality of life and wellbeing: identifying important dimensions and assessing their inclusion in multi-attribute utility instruments.
Engel L; Chen G; Richardson J; Mihalopoulos C
Qual Life Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2873-2884. PubMed ID: 30006664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing and explaining differences in the magnitude, content, and sensitivity of utilities predicted by the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HUI 3, 15D, QWB, and AQoL-8D multiattribute utility instruments.
Richardson J; Khan MA; Iezzi A; Maxwell A
Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):276-91. PubMed ID: 25159172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating the disutility of relapse in relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis using the EQ-5D-5L, AQoL-8D, EQ-5D-5L-psychosocial, and SF-6D: implications for health economic evaluation models.
Ahmad H; Campbell JA; van der Mei I; Taylor BV; Xia Q; Zhao T; Palmer AJ
Qual Life Res; 2023 Dec; 32(12):3373-3387. PubMed ID: 37522942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the preference-based EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
Yang F; Lau T; Lee E; Vathsala A; Chia KS; Luo N
Eur J Health Econ; 2015 Dec; 16(9):1019-26. PubMed ID: 25519850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploring psychometric properties of the SF-6D, a preference-based health-related quality of life measure, in the context of spinal cord injury.
Engel L; Bryan S; Evers SM; Dirksen CD; Noonan VK; Whitehurst DG
Qual Life Res; 2014 Oct; 23(8):2383-93. PubMed ID: 24700379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing health state utilities for people with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome in Australia using the EQ-5D-5L, AQoL-8D and EQ-5D-5L-psychosocial instruments.
Orji NC; Cox IA; Jason LA; Chen G; Zhao T; Rogerson MJ; Kelly RM; Wills K; Hensher M; Palmer AJ; de Graaff B; Campbell JA
Qual Life Res; 2024 Jan; 33(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 37561337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of health-related quality of life in Australian patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and the AQoL-8D.
Cox IA; Campbell J; de Graaff B; Otahal P; Corte TJ; Moodley Y; Hopkins P; Macansh S; Walters EH; Palmer AJ
Qual Life Res; 2023 Feb; 32(2):473-493. PubMed ID: 35927542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health utility measurement for people living with HIV/AIDS under combined antiretroviral therapy: A comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D.
Wang X; Luo H; Yao E; Tang R; Dong W; Liu F; Liang J; Xiao M; Zhang Z; Niu J; Song L; Fu L; Li X; Qian S; Guo Q; Song Z
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Nov; 101(45):e31666. PubMed ID: 36397330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Head-to-Head Comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments in Patients Who Have Previously Undergone Bariatric Surgery.
Campbell JA; Palmer AJ; Venn A; Sharman M; Otahal P; Neil A
Patient; 2016 Aug; 9(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 26841910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discriminative validity of the EQ-5D-5 L and SF-12 in older adults with arthritis.
Tawiah AK; Al Sayah F; Ohinmaa A; Johnson JA
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Apr; 17(1):68. PubMed ID: 30995930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and reliability of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D multi-attribute utility instrument.
Richardson J; Iezzi A; Khan MA; Maxwell A
Patient; 2014; 7(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 24271592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of EQ-5D-5L, VAS, and SF-6D in Thai Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.
Thaweethamcharoen T; Noparatayaporn P; Sritippayawan S; Aiyasanon N
Value Health Reg Issues; 2019 May; 18():59-64. PubMed ID: 30502661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Health state utility instruments compared: inquiring into nonlinearity across EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI-3 and 15D.
Gamst-Klaussen T; Chen G; Lamu AN; Olsen JA
Qual Life Res; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1667-78. PubMed ID: 26687615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
