192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27098717)
1. Clinical Efficiency of Three Caries Removal Systems: Rotary Excavation, Carisolv, and Papacarie.
Hegde S; Kakti A; Bolar DR; Bhaskar SA
J Dent Child (Chic); 2016; 83(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 27098717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv and Papacarie - a papain gel.
Kumar J; Nayak M; Prasad KL; Gupta N
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):697. PubMed ID: 23422631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical randomized controlled trial of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv).
Lozano-Chourio MA; Zambrano O; González H; Quero M
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2006 May; 16(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 16643536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chemical, morphological and microhardness changes of dentine after chemomechanical caries removal.
Hamama HH; Yiu CK; Burrow MF; King NM
Aust Dent J; 2013 Sep; 58(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 23981208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical and mechanical caries removal: status of the restorations at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
Kirzioglu Z; Gurbuz T; Yilmaz Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 16969657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of a chemomechanical method for caries removal in children and adolescents.
Peric T; Markovic D; Petrovic B
Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(5):277-83. PubMed ID: 19452332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a comparitive clinical study.
Kochhar GK; Srivastava N; Pandit IK; Gugnani N; Gupta M
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2011; 36(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 22900437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars : evaluation of marginal leakage and shear bond strength in bonded restorations--an in vitro study.
Viral PM; Nagarathna C; Shakuntala BS
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 37(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 23855171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy and tolerance of papain gel with conventional drilling method: a clinico-microbiological study.
Goyal PA; Kumari R; Kannan VP; Madhu S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 25823480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: an in vivo study.
Bohari MR; Chunawalla YK; Ahmed BM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 22430692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of Papacarie in primary teeth.
Kotb RM; Abdella AA; El Kateb MA; Ahmed AM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2009; 34(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 20297701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials on Chemomechanical Caries Removal.
Hamama HH; Yiu CK; Burrow MF; King NM
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(4):E167-78. PubMed ID: 26167737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of chemo-mechanical caries removal with Carisolv.
Hosein T; Hasan A
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Apr; 18(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 18474155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. X-ray microtomography assessment of Carisolv and Papacarie effect on dentin mineral density and amount of removed tissue.
AlHumaid J; Al-Harbi F; El Tantawi M; Elembaby A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2018 May; 76(4):236-240. PubMed ID: 29161950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Carisolv system vs traditional rotating instruments for caries removal in the primary dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lai G; Lara Capi C; Cocco F; Cagetti MG; Lingström P; Almhöjd U; Campus G
Acta Odontol Scand; 2015; 73(8):569-80. PubMed ID: 25772193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary teeth caries removal using the Carisolv chemomechanical method: a clinical trial.
Kavvadia K; Karagianni V; Polychronopoulou A; Papagiannouli L
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15080354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Caries-removal effectiveness and minimal-invasiveness potential of caries-excavation techniques: a micro-CT investigation.
Neves Ade A; Coutinho E; De Munck J; Van Meerbeek B
J Dent; 2011 Feb; 39(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 21111770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fluorescence of primary dentine after chemomechanical and conventional rotary excavation.
Corrêa FN; Rocha RO; Soares FZ; Rodrigues-Filho LE; Rodrigues CR
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 9(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 18793594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current update of chemomechanical caries removal methods.
Hamama H; Yiu C; Burrow M
Aust Dent J; 2014 Dec; 59(4):446-56; quiz 525. PubMed ID: 25131424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv) with that of conventional excavation in reducing the cariogenic flora.
Azrak B; Callaway A; Grundheber A; Stender E; Willershausen B
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2004 May; 14(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 15139953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
