BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27098746)

  • 1. Exploring how individuals complete the choice tasks in a discrete choice experiment: an interview study.
    Veldwijk J; Determann D; Lambooij MS; van Til JA; Korfage IJ; de Bekker-Grob EW; de Wit GA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():45. PubMed ID: 27098746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient preference for a long-acting recombinant FSH product in ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF: a discrete choice experiment.
    van den Wijngaard L; Rodijk IC; van der Veen F; Gooskens-van Erven MH; Koks CA; Verhoeve HR; Mol BW; van Wely M; Mochtar MH
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 25432926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Words or graphics to present a Discrete Choice Experiment: Does it matter?
    Veldwijk J; Lambooij MS; van Til JA; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Smit HA; de Wit GA
    Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Nov; 98(11):1376-84. PubMed ID: 26117796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making sense of patient priorities: applying discrete choice methods in primary care using 'think aloud' technique.
    Cheraghi-Sohi S; Bower P; Mead N; McDonald R; Whalley D; Roland M
    Fam Pract; 2007 Jun; 24(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 17478438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using decision mapping to inform the development of a stated choice survey to elicit youth preferences for sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in rural Malawi.
    Michaels-Igbokwe C; Lagarde M; Cairns J; Terris-Prestholt F
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Mar; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 24509049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Labeled versus unlabeled discrete choice experiments in health economics: an application to colorectal cancer screening.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Hol L; Donkers B; van Dam L; Habbema JD; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ; Essink-Bot ML; Steyerberg EW
    Value Health; 2010; 13(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 19912597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening.
    Cheng J; Pullenayegum E; Marshall DA; Marshall JK; Thabane L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Feb; 12():15. PubMed ID: 22348526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of presenting information about invasive follow-up testing on individuals' noninvasive colorectal cancer screening participation decision: results from a discrete choice experiment.
    Benning TM; Dellaert BG; Severens JL; Dirksen CD
    Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):578-87. PubMed ID: 25128051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preferences for Vaccination: Does Health Literacy Make a Difference?
    Veldwijk J; van der Heide I; Rademakers J; Schuit AJ; de Wit GA; Uiters E; Lambooij MS
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Nov; 35(8):948-58. PubMed ID: 26338176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parental preferences for rotavirus vaccination in young children: a discrete choice experiment.
    Veldwijk J; Lambooij MS; Bruijning-Verhagen PC; Smit HA; de Wit GA
    Vaccine; 2014 Oct; 32(47):6277-83. PubMed ID: 25236585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient Preferences for Features of Health Care Delivery Systems: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Mühlbacher AC; Bethge S; Reed SD; Schulman KA
    Health Serv Res; 2016 Apr; 51(2):704-27. PubMed ID: 26255998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preferences for medication attributes among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK.
    Gelhorn HL; Stringer SM; Brooks A; Thompson C; Monz BU; Boye KS; Hach T; Lund SS; Palencia R
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2013 Sep; 15(9):802-9. PubMed ID: 23464623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How do women trade-off benefits and risks in chemotherapy treatment decisions based on gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer? A discrete choice experiment.
    Marshall DA; Deal K; Bombard Y; Leighl N; MacDonald KV; Trudeau M
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jun; 6(6):e010981. PubMed ID: 27256091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methods.
    Whitty JA; Walker R; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e90635. PubMed ID: 24759637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting food choices of older adults from high and low socioeconomic groups: a discrete choice experiment.
    Kamphuis CB; de Bekker-Grob EW; van Lenthe FJ
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2015 Apr; 101(4):768-74. PubMed ID: 25833974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient preference for latent tuberculosis infection preventive treatment: a discrete choice experiment.
    Guo N; Marra CA; FitzGerald JM; Elwood RK; Anis AH; Marra F
    Value Health; 2011; 14(6):937-43. PubMed ID: 21914516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of information on prostate cancer screening decision process: a discrete choice experiment.
    Charvin M; Launoy G; Berchi C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 May; 20(1):467. PubMed ID: 32456702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. To explore preferences and willingness to pay for attributes regarding stoma appliances amongst patients in the UK, France and Germany.
    Nafees B; Lloyd A; Elkin E; Porret T
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2015 Apr; 31(4):687-95. PubMed ID: 25651482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preferences for treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): a discrete choice experiment.
    Mühlbacher AC; Rudolph I; Lincke HJ; Nübling M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Aug; 9():149. PubMed ID: 19678946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrete-choice experiments versus rating scale exercises to evaluate the importance of attributes.
    Wijnen BF; van der Putten IM; Groothuis S; de Kinderen RJ; Noben CY; Paulus AT; Ramaekers BL; Vogel GC; Hiligsmann M
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015; 15(4):721-8. PubMed ID: 25835045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.