These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27099103)

  • 1. Evaluating recommended audiometric changes to candidacy using the speech intelligibility index.
    Leal C; Marriage J; Vickers D
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():8-12. PubMed ID: 27099103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children: criterion of candidacy derived from an observational study.
    Lovett RE; Vickers DA; Summerfield AQ
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 25170781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of Pure-Tone Audiologic Thresholds for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidacy: A Systematic Review.
    de Kleijn JL; van Kalmthout LWM; van der Vossen MJB; Vonck BMD; Topsakal V; Bruijnzeel H
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Jul; 144(7):630-638. PubMed ID: 29800000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiogram and cochlear implant candidacy--UK perspective.
    Chundu S; Flynn SL
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jul; 15(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 24144046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can routine office-based audiometry predict cochlear implant evaluation results?
    Gubbels SP; Gartrell BC; Ploch JL; Hanson KD
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jan; 127(1):216-222. PubMed ID: 27797418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Access to aidable residual hearing in adult candidates for cochlear implantation in the UK.
    Fielden CA; Hampton R; Smith S; Kitterick PT
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():70-3. PubMed ID: 27099116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults I: theory and measures of effectiveness.
    UK Cochlear Implant Study Group
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):310-35. PubMed ID: 15292774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Glasberg BR; Puria S
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):907-22. PubMed ID: 18685497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audibility and speech perception of children using wide dynamic range compression hearing AIDS.
    Davidson LS; Skinner MW
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 17182879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Criteria versus guidelines: Are we doing the best for our paediatric patients?
    Hanvey K; Ambler M; Maggs J; Wilson K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():78-82. PubMed ID: 27099118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes in implanted teenagers who do not meet the adult candidacy criteria.
    Vickers F; Bradley J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():83-8. PubMed ID: 27099119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. International survey of cochlear implant candidacy.
    Vickers D; De Raeve L; Graham J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():36-41. PubMed ID: 27099109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expert opinion: Can different assessments be used to overcome current candidacy issues?
    Lamb B
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():3-7. PubMed ID: 27078520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining cochlear implant candidacy in children with residual hearing: A scoping review.
    Pignac S; Sygal N; Biglari M; Olds J; Fitzpatrick EM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Feb; 177():111855. PubMed ID: 38190764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of hearing preservation outcomes in routine cochlear implant care: Implications for candidacy.
    Verschuur C; Hellier W; Teo C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():62-5. PubMed ID: 27099115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preimplant Hearing Aid Fittings and Aided Audibility for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Nickerson A; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):703-711. PubMed ID: 31044697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Earphone and Aided Word Recognition Differences in Cochlear Implant Candidates.
    McRackan TR; Fabie JE; Burton JA; Munawar S; Holcomb MA; Dubno JR
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):e543-e549. PubMed ID: 29912837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.