These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27100680)

  • 1. Contamination during criminal investigation: Detecting police contamination and secondary DNA transfer from evidence bags.
    Fonneløp AE; Johannessen H; Egeland T; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jul; 23():121-129. PubMed ID: 27100680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contamination incidents in the pre-analytical phase of forensic DNA analysis in Austria-Statistics of 17 years.
    Pickrahn I; Kreindl G; Müller E; Dunkelmann B; Zahrer W; Cemper-Kiesslich J; Neuhuber F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():12-18. PubMed ID: 28843849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Secondary and subsequent DNA transfer during criminal investigation.
    Fonneløp AE; Egeland T; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():155-162. PubMed ID: 26005954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Leading-edge forensic DNA analyses and the necessity of including crime scene investigators, police officers and technicians in a DNA elimination database.
    Lapointe M; Rogic A; Bourgoin S; Jolicoeur C; Séguin D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():50-55. PubMed ID: 26117338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DNA transfer within forensic exhibit packaging: potential for DNA loss and relocation.
    Goray M; van Oorschot RA; Mitchell JR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 21546329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DNA transfer by examination tools--a risk for forensic casework?
    Szkuta B; Harvey ML; Ballantyne KN; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():246-254. PubMed ID: 25735003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An optimized procedure for obtaining DNA from fired and unfired ammunition.
    Montpetit S; O'Donnell P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():70-74. PubMed ID: 25828369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human DNA contamination of mortuaries: does it matter?
    Rutty GN
    J Pathol; 2000 Mar; 190(4):410-1. PubMed ID: 10699987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA transfer: DNA acquired by gloves during casework examinations.
    Goray M; Pirie E; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():167-174. PubMed ID: 30414553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DNA accumulation and transfer within an operational forensic exhibit storeroom.
    Mercer C; Taylor D; Henry J; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jan; 62():102799. PubMed ID: 36274409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What's on the bag? The DNA composition of evidence bags pre- and post-exhibit examination.
    Mercer C; Henry J; Taylor D; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Mar; 57():102652. PubMed ID: 34896975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DNA decontamination of fingerprint brushes.
    Szkuta B; Oorschot RAHV; Ballantyne KN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():41-50. PubMed ID: 28577456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gunshot residue background on police officers: Considerations for secondary transfer in GSR evidence evaluation.
    Lucas N; Cook M; Kirkbride KP; Kobus H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():293-301. PubMed ID: 30852412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
    Baechler S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Touch DNA collection versus firearm fingerprinting: comparing evidence production and identification outcomes.
    Nunn S
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 May; 58(3):601-8. PubMed ID: 23458456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A holistic approach for the selection of forensic DNA swabs.
    Comment D; Gouy A; Zingg C; Zieger M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jul; 348():111737. PubMed ID: 37247525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting and collecting traces of semen and blood from outdoor crime scenes using crime scene dogs and presumptive tests.
    Skalleberg AG; Bouzga MM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jul; 264():146-52. PubMed ID: 27174517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs.
    Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lessons from a study of DNA contaminations from police services and forensic laboratories in Switzerland.
    Basset P; Castella V
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():147-154. PubMed ID: 29275090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of DNA contamination of bone samples in forensic case analysis and anthropological research.
    von Wurmb-Schwark N; Heinrich A; Freudenberg M; Gebühr M; Schwark T
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2008 May; 10(3):125-30. PubMed ID: 18035582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.