BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27100731)

  • 1. Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome.
    Berney DM; Beltran L; Fisher G; North BV; Greenberg D; Møller H; Soosay G; Scardino P; Cuzick J
    Br J Cancer; 2016 May; 114(10):1078-83. PubMed ID: 27100731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The percentage of high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma in prostate biopsies significantly improves on Grade Groups in the prediction of prostate cancer death.
    Berney DM; Beltran L; Sandu H; Soosay G; Møller H; Scardino P; Murphy J; Ahmad A; Cuzick J;
    Histopathology; 2019 Oct; 75(4):589-597. PubMed ID: 31032963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score.
    Epstein JI; Zelefsky MJ; Sjoberg DD; Nelson JB; Egevad L; Magi-Galluzzi C; Vickers AJ; Parwani AV; Reuter VE; Fine SW; Eastham JA; Wiklund P; Han M; Reddy CA; Ciezki JP; Nyberg T; Klein EA
    Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):428-35. PubMed ID: 26166626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gleason grade grouping of prostate cancer is of prognostic value in Asian men.
    Yeong J; Sultana R; Teo J; Huang HH; Yuen J; Tan PH; Khor LY
    J Clin Pathol; 2017 Sep; 70(9):745-753. PubMed ID: 28289065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.
    Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 27876305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
    Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
    Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gleason score 5 + 3 = 8 (grade group 4) prostate cancer-a rare occurrence with contemporary grading.
    Kryvenko ON; Williamson SR; Schwartz LE; Epstein JI
    Hum Pathol; 2020 Mar; 97():40-51. PubMed ID: 31923450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.
    Kır G; Seneldir H; Gumus E
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Feb; 20():48-51. PubMed ID: 26750655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics and outcome of prostate cancer patients with overall biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 and highest Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 or > 3 + 4 = 7.
    Verhoef EI; Kweldam CF; Kümmerlin IP; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Incrocci L; van der Kwast TH; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJ
    Histopathology; 2018 Apr; 72(5):760-765. PubMed ID: 29094386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
    Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate cancer outcomes of men with biopsy Gleason score 6 and 7 without cribriform or intraductal carcinoma.
    Kweldam CF; Kümmerlin IP; Nieboer D; Verhoef EI; Steyerberg EW; Incrocci L; Bangma CH; van der Kwast TH; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Oct; 66():26-33. PubMed ID: 27522247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.
    Sauter G; Steurer S; Clauditz TS; Krech T; Wittmer C; Lutz F; Lennartz M; Janssen T; Hakimi N; Simon R; von Petersdorff-Campen M; Jacobsen F; von Loga K; Wilczak W; Minner S; Tsourlakis MC; Chirico V; Haese A; Heinzer H; Beyer B; Graefen M; Michl U; Salomon G; Steuber T; Budäus LH; Hekeler E; Malsy-Mink J; Kutzera S; Fraune C; Göbel C; Huland H; Schlomm T
    Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 26542947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preoperative Prostate-specific Antigen Isoform p2PSA and Its Derivatives, %p2PSA and Prostate Health Index, Predict Pathologic Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multicentric European Prospective Study.
    Fossati N; Buffi NM; Haese A; Stephan C; Larcher A; McNicholas T; de la Taille A; Freschi M; Lughezzani G; Abrate A; Bini V; Palou Redorta J; Graefen M; Guazzoni G; Lazzeri M
    Eur Urol; 2015 Jul; 68(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 25139197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of very low prostate-specific antigen levels with increased cancer-specific death in men with high-grade prostate cancer.
    Mahal BA; Aizer AA; Efstathiou JA; Nguyen PL
    Cancer; 2016 Jan; 122(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26371600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation of Preoperative and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score: Examining the Predictors of Upgrade and Downgrade Results.
    Pourmand G; Gooran S; Hossieni SR; Guitynavard F; Safavi M; Sharifi A; Mokhtari E
    Acta Med Iran; 2017 Apr; 55(4):249-253. PubMed ID: 28532136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PI-RADS version 2 for prediction of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy: a preliminary study in patients with biopsy-proven Gleason Score 7 (3+4) prostate cancer.
    Woo S; Kim SY; Lee J; Kim SH; Cho JY
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3580-7. PubMed ID: 26847042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in Japanese men with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.
    Miyake H; Muramaki M; Furukawa J; Tanaka H; Inoue TA; Fujisawa M
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1511-6. PubMed ID: 22658882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic significance of percentage Gleason grade 5 prostatic adenocarcinoma in needle biopsies from patients treated by radical prostatectomy.
    Yaxley W; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Thunders MC; Kenwright DN; Egevad L; Samaratunga H
    Pathology; 2022 Oct; 54(6):694-699. PubMed ID: 35613972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.