These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27100787)

  • 1. Target and Non-Target Processing during Oddball and Cyberball: A Comparative Event-Related Potential Study.
    Weschke S; Niedeggen M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153941. PubMed ID: 27100787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ERP effects and perceived exclusion in the Cyberball paradigm: Correlates of expectancy violation?
    Weschke S; Niedeggen M
    Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 1624():265-274. PubMed ID: 26236023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dull to Social Acceptance Rather than Sensitivity to Social Ostracism in Interpersonal Interaction for Depression: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence from Cyberball Tasks.
    Zhang Q; Li X; Wang K; Zhou X; Dong Y; Zhang L; Xie W; Mu J; Li H; Zhu C; Yu F
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():162. PubMed ID: 28408877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of the physical presence of co-players on perceived ostracism and event-related brain potentials in the cyberball paradigm.
    Weschke S; Niedeggen M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71928. PubMed ID: 23951269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are there benefits of social overinclusion? Behavioral and ERP effects in the Cyberball paradigm.
    Niedeggen M; Sarauli N; Cacciola S; Weschke S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():935. PubMed ID: 25477807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pain Processing after Social Exclusion and Its Relation to Rejection Sensitivity in Borderline Personality Disorder.
    Bungert M; Koppe G; Niedtfeld I; Vollstädt-Klein S; Schmahl C; Lis S; Bohus M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133693. PubMed ID: 26241850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Violated Expectations in the Cyberball Paradigm: Testing the Expectancy Account of Social Participation With ERP.
    Schuck K; Niedeggen M; Kerschreiter R
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1762. PubMed ID: 30319487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncovering the underlying factors of ERP changes in the cyberball paradigm: A systematic review investigating the impact of ostracism and paradigm characteristics.
    Vanhollebeke G; Aers F; Goethals L; Raedt R; Baeken C; Mierlo PV; Vanderhasselt MA
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2023 Dec; 155():105464. PubMed ID: 37977278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loss of control as a violation of expectations: Testing the predictions of a common inconsistency compensation approach in an inclusionary cyberball game.
    Niedeggen M; Kerschreiter R; Schuck K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221817. PubMed ID: 31498829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Being low prepares for being neglected: Verticality affects expectancy of social participation.
    Niedeggen M; Kerschreiter R; Hirte D; Weschke S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):574-581. PubMed ID: 27368640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. P300 and probability: comparison of oddball and single-stimulus paradigms.
    Polich J; Margala C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1997 Feb; 25(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 9101341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential processing in the classic oddball task: ERP components, probability, and behavior.
    Fogarty JS; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Mar; 56(3):e13300. PubMed ID: 30456921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing social participation: an event-related brain potential study.
    Gutz L; Küpper C; Renneberg B; Niedeggen M
    Neuroreport; 2011 Jun; 22(9):453-8. PubMed ID: 21558970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural correlates of emotional intelligence in a visual emotional oddball task: an ERP study.
    Raz S; Dan O; Zysberg L
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Nov; 91():79-86. PubMed ID: 25265320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social exclusion induces early-stage perceptual and behavioral changes in response to social cues.
    Kawamoto T; Nittono H; Ura M
    Soc Neurosci; 2014; 9(2):174-85. PubMed ID: 24499456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying fast optical signal and event-related potential relationships during a visual oddball task.
    Proulx N; Samadani AA; Chau T
    Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():119-128. PubMed ID: 29777826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social exclusion impairs distractor suppression but not target enhancement in selective attention.
    Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Fan L; Zhang L; Yuan S; Yang D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Nov; 121():72-79. PubMed ID: 28601652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contextual exclusion processing: an fMRI study of rejection in a performance-related context.
    Wagels L; Bergs R; Clemens B; Bauchmüller M; Gur RC; Schneider F; Habel U; Kohn N
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2017 Jun; 11(3):874-886. PubMed ID: 27319001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociable brain mechanisms for processing social exclusion and rule violation.
    Bolling DZ; Pitskel NB; Deen B; Crowley MJ; McPartland JC; Mayes LC; Pelphrey KA
    Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(3):2462-71. PubMed ID: 20974272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feeling Hurt: Pain Sensitivity is Correlated With and Modulated by Social Distress.
    Canaipa R; Treister R; Lang M; Moreira JM; Castro-Caldas A
    Clin J Pain; 2016 Jan; 32(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 25654536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.