These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27100815)

  • 1. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution at the Internal Implant-Abutment Connection.
    Cho SY; Huh YH; Park CJ; Cho LR
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2016; 36(3):e49-58. PubMed ID: 27100815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis on Stress Distribution of Internal Implant-Abutment Engagement Features.
    Cho SY; Huh YH; Park CJ; Cho LR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):319-327. PubMed ID: 29534119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.
    Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation.
    Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of different design of abutment and implant on stress distribution in 2 implants and peripheral bone: A finite element analysis study.
    Kul E; Korkmaz İH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):664.e1-664.e9. PubMed ID: 33573834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress distribution in the abutment and retention screw of a single implant supporting a prosthesis with platform switching.
    Alvarez-Arenal A; Segura-Mori L; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Gago A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):e112-21. PubMed ID: 23748329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of tightening torque on screw stress and formation of implant-abutment microgaps: A finite element analysis.
    Honório Tonin BS; He Y; Ye N; Chew HP; Fok A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):882-889. PubMed ID: 33472752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioğlu H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 12869007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws.
    Alkan I; Sertgöz A; Ekici B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15116032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
    Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models.
    Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H
    J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of different abutment connection designs on the stress distribution around five different implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Balik A; Karatas MO; Keskin H
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Sep; 38 Spec No():491-6. PubMed ID: 21574838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Pessoa RS; Vaz LG; Marcantonio E; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Jaecques SV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 20862404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Liu S; Tang C; Yu J; Dai W; Bao Y; Hu D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1111-8. PubMed ID: 24882594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of different implant-abutment joint design on abutment and abutment screw stress].
    Gao Y; Chen J; Wang GQ; Li YK; Bian CR
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2021 Oct; 30(5):481-487. PubMed ID: 34888599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.