These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27101525)

  • 1. Evaluating Groundwater Interbasin Flow Using Multiple Models and Multiple Types of Data.
    Ye M; Wang L; Pohlmann KF; Chapman JB
    Ground Water; 2016 Nov; 54(6):805-817. PubMed ID: 27101525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A model-averaging method for assessing groundwater conceptual model uncertainty.
    Ye M; Pohlmann KF; Chapman JB; Pohll GM; Reeves DM
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(5):716-28. PubMed ID: 19788638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model uncertainty--parameter uncertainty versus conceptual models.
    Højberg AL; Refsgaard JC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):177-86. PubMed ID: 16304950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subsurface microbial communities as a tool for characterizing regional-scale groundwater flow.
    Merino N; Jackson TR; Campbell JH; Kersting AB; Sackett J; Fisher JC; Bruckner JC; Zavarin M; Hamilton-Brehm SD; Moser DP
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Oct; 842():156768. PubMed ID: 35738377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncertainty analysis of a groundwater flow model in East-central Florida.
    Sepúlveda N; Doherty J
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(3):464-74. PubMed ID: 25040026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The site-scale saturated zone flow model for Yucca Mountain: calibration of different conceptual models and their impact on flow paths.
    Zyvoloski G; Kwicklis E; Eddebbarh AA; Arnold B; Faunt C; Robinson BA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2003; 62-63():731-50. PubMed ID: 12714319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian inference of coupled groundwater flow and radiogenic helium-4 production and transport at the catchment scale.
    Casillas-Trasvina A; Rogiers B; Beerten K; Wouters L; Walraevens K
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Dec; 954():176510. PubMed ID: 39362538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of multiple tracer methods to estimate low groundwater flow velocities.
    Reimus PW; Arnold BW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Apr; 199():1-13. PubMed ID: 28262572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pathline Density Distributions in a Null-Space Monte Carlo Approach to Assess Groundwater Pathways.
    Moeck C; Molson J; Schirmer M
    Ground Water; 2020 Mar; 58(2):189-207. PubMed ID: 31066038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Open, Object-Based Framework for Generating Anisotropy in Sedimentary Subsurface Models.
    Bennett JP; Haslauer CP; Ross M; Cirpka OA
    Ground Water; 2019 May; 57(3):420-429. PubMed ID: 29862499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical postcalibration uncertainty analysis: Yucca Mountain, Nevada.
    James SC; Doherty JE; Eddebbarh AA
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(6):851-69. PubMed ID: 19744249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automating Recession Curve Displacement Recharge Estimation.
    Smith B; Schwartz S
    Ground Water; 2017 Jan; 55(1):81-87. PubMed ID: 27391931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modelling of recharge and pollutant fluxes to urban groundwaters.
    Thomas A; Tellam J
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 May; 360(1-3):158-79. PubMed ID: 16325236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating River Conductance from Prior Information to Improve Surface-Subsurface Model Calibration.
    Cousquer Y; Pryet A; Flipo N; Delbart C; Dupuy A
    Ground Water; 2017 May; 55(3):408-418. PubMed ID: 28122410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reducing uncertainty in calibrating aquifer flow model with multiple scales of heterogeneity.
    Zhang Y
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 24749908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transient Recharge Estimability Through Field-Scale Groundwater Model Calibration.
    Knowling MJ; Werner AD
    Ground Water; 2017 Nov; 55(6):827-840. PubMed ID: 28498485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Highly parameterized inversion of groundwater reactive transport for a complex field site.
    Carniato L; Schoups G; van de Giesen N; Seuntjens P; Bastiaens L; Sapion H
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Feb; 173():38-58. PubMed ID: 25528244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of linking a soil-water-balance model with a groundwater-flow model.
    Stanton JS; Ryter DW; Peterson SM
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(4):613-22. PubMed ID: 23036222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 1DTempPro V2: New Features for Inferring Groundwater/Surface-Water Exchange.
    Koch FW; Voytek EB; Day-Lewis FD; Healy R; Briggs MA; Lane JW; Werkema D
    Ground Water; 2016 May; 54(3):434-9. PubMed ID: 26372016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accounting for aquifer heterogeneity from geological data to management tools.
    Blouin M; Martel R; Gloaguen E
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(3):421-31. PubMed ID: 22924605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.