165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27101572)
1. MRCP Versus ERCP in the Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis in Children: Which Is the Better Choice?
Kolodziejczyk E; Jurkiewicz E; Pertkiewicz J; Wejnarska K; Dadalski M; Kierkus J; Woynarowski M; Ryzko J; Oracz G
Pancreas; 2016 Sep; 45(8):1115-9. PubMed ID: 27101572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is Cambridge scoring in chronic pancreatitis the same using ERCP and MRCP?: A need for revision of standards.
Swensson J; Akisik F; Collins D; Olesen SS; Drewes AM; Frøkjær JB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Feb; 46(2):647-654. PubMed ID: 32740862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.
Dillman JR; Patel RM; Lin TK; Towbin AJ; Trout AT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2377-2383. PubMed ID: 30874847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Administration of secretin (RG1068) increases the sensitivity of detection of duct abnormalities by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis.
Sherman S; Freeman ML; Tarnasky PR; Wilcox CM; Kulkarni A; Aisen AM; Jacoby D; Kozarek RA
Gastroenterology; 2014 Sep; 147(3):646-654.e2. PubMed ID: 24906040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chronic pancreatitis: MRCP versus ERCP for quantitative caliber measurement and qualitative evaluation.
Tamura R; Ishibashi T; Takahashi S
Radiology; 2006 Mar; 238(3):920-8. PubMed ID: 16424235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The value of magnetic resonance tomography (MRT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors].
Diehl SJ; Lehmann KJ; Gaa J; Meier-Willersen HJ; Wendl K; Georgi M
Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10370410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRCP-secretin test-guided management of idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis: long-term outcomes.
Testoni PA; Mariani A; Curioni S; Zanello A; Masci E
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1028-34. PubMed ID: 18179795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreas divisum.
Mosler P; Akisik F; Sandrasegaran K; Fogel E; Watkins J; Alazmi W; Sherman S; Lehman G; Imperiale T; McHenry L
Dig Dis Sci; 2012 Jan; 57(1):170-4. PubMed ID: 21761168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of MRCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis: An institutional analysis and literature review.
Badger WR; Borgert AJ; Kallies KJ; Kothari SN
Am J Surg; 2017 Aug; 214(2):251-255. PubMed ID: 27986260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective comparison study.
Pungpapong S; Wallace MB; Woodward TA; Noh KW; Raimondo M
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 41(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 17198070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic yield of ERCP and secretin-enhanced MRCP and EUS in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis of unknown aetiology.
Mariani A; Arcidiacono PG; Curioni S; Giussani A; Testoni PA
Dig Liver Dis; 2009 Oct; 41(10):753-8. PubMed ID: 19278909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Weber C; Kuhlencordt R; Grotelueschen R; Wedegaertner U; Ang TL; Adam G; Soehendra N; Seitz U
Endoscopy; 2008 Sep; 40(9):739-45. PubMed ID: 18698533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought.
Aydelotte JD; Ali J; Huynh PT; Coopwood TB; Uecker JM; Brown CV
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 26047762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between MRCP and ERCP findings at a tertiary care hospital.
Rahman R; Ju J; Shamma's J; Goebel S; Sundaram U
W V Med J; 2010; 106(5):14-9. PubMed ID: 21739880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis.
Lee SL; Kim HK; Choi HH; Jeon BS; Kim TH; Choi JM; Ku YM; Kim SW; Kim SS; Chae HS
Pancreatology; 2018 Jan; 18(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29246689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRCP vs. ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of current literature.
Hekimoglu K; Ustundag Y; Dusak A; Erdem Z; Karademir B; Aydemir S; Gundogdu S
J Dig Dis; 2008 Aug; 9(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 18956595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Findings on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and pancreatic function test in suspected chronic pancreatitis and negative cross-sectional imaging.
Parsi MA; Conwell DL; Zuccaro G; Stevens T; Lopez R; Dumot JA; Vargo JJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Dec; 6(12):1432-6. PubMed ID: 19081531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Kaltenthaler E; Vergel YB; Chilcott J; Thomas S; Blakeborough T; Walters SJ; Bouchier H
Health Technol Assess; 2004 Mar; 8(10):iii, 1-89. PubMed ID: 14982656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diagnostic value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].
Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J
Orv Hetil; 2004 Mar; 145(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 15085592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
