112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27101790)
1. Is pain from mammography reduced by the use of a radiolucent MammoPad? Local experience in Hong Kong.
Chan HH; Lo G; Cheung PS
Hong Kong Med J; 2016 Jun; 22(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 27101790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduction of discomfort during mammography utilizing a radiolucent cushioning pad.
Markle L; Roux S; Sayre JW
Breast J; 2004; 10(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 15239794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography in females with an implanted medical device: impact on image quality, pain and anxiety.
Paap E; Witjes M; van Landsveld-Verhoeven C; Pijnappel RM; Maas AH; Broeders MJ
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160142. PubMed ID: 27452263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer screening practices among Hong Kong Chinese women.
Kwok C; Fong DY
Cancer Nurs; 2014; 37(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 23357890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography Screening of Chinese Immigrant Women: Ever Screened Versus Never Screened.
Lee-Lin F; Nguyen T; Pedhiwala N; Dieckmann N; Menon U
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2015 Sep; 42(5):470-8. PubMed ID: 26302276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Study on knowledge, experiences and barriers to mammography among working women from Delhi.
Khokhar A
Indian J Cancer; 2015; 52(4):531-5. PubMed ID: 26960467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is mammography painful? A multicenter patient survey.
Stomper PC; Kopans DB; Sadowsky NL; Sonnenfeld MR; Swann CA; Gelman RS; Meyer JE; Jochelson MS; Hunt MS; Allen PD
Arch Intern Med; 1988 Mar; 148(3):521-4. PubMed ID: 3341852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of clinical and pathological characteristics between screen-detected and self-detected breast cancers: a Hong Kong study.
Lau SS; Cheung PS; Wong TT; Ma MK; Kwan WH
Hong Kong Med J; 2016 Jun; 22(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 27022189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical assessment of a radiolucent cushion for mammography.
Tabar L; Lebovic GS; Hermann GD; Kaufman CS; Alexander C; Sayre J
Acta Radiol; 2004 Apr; 45(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 15191098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of electrical impedance tomography qualitative and quantitative values and comparison of the numeric pain distress score against mammography.
Juliana N; Shahar S; Chelliah KK; Ghazali AR; Osman F; Sahar MA
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(14):5759-65. PubMed ID: 25081698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast compression and experienced pain during mammography by use of three different compression paddles.
Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Evensen KT; Hantho C; Iden KA; Hofvind S
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 115():59-65. PubMed ID: 31084760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the radiographer on the pain felt during mammography.
Van Goethem M; Mortelmans D; Bruyninckx E; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Van Hove E; De Schepper A
Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2384-9. PubMed ID: 14534806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reduced compression mammography to reduce breast pain.
Chida K; Komatsu Y; Sai M; Nakagami A; Yamada T; Yamashita T; Mori I; Ishibashi T; Maruoka S; Zuguchi M
Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 19135922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An analysis of reported discomfort caused by mammographic X-ray amongst attenders at an Australian pilot breast screening program.
Cockburn J; Cawson J; Hill D; De Luise T
Australas Radiol; 1992 May; 36(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 1520168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Opportunistic breast cancer screening in Hong Kong; a revisit of the Kwong Wah Hospital experience.
Lui CY; Lam HS; Chan LK; Tam KF; Chan CM; Leung TY; Mak KL
Hong Kong Med J; 2007 Apr; 13(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 17406037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Premedication to reduce discomfort during screening mammography.
Lambertz CK; Johnson CJ; Montgomery PG; Maxwell JR
Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):765-72. PubMed ID: 18647845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammography Decision Aid Reduces Decisional Conflict for Women in Their Forties Considering Screening.
Eden KB; Scariati P; Klein K; Watson L; Remiker M; Hribar M; Forro V; Michaels L; Nelson HD
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2015 Dec; 24(12):1013-20. PubMed ID: 26360918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study of socio-economic characteristics, diagnosis and outcome of women participating or not participating in mammogram screening.
Padoan M; Ferrante D; Pretti G; Magnani C
Ann Ig; 2014; 26(6):518-26. PubMed ID: 25524076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force.
de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Branderhorst W; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081901. PubMed ID: 23927315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is Individualizing Breast Compression during Mammography useful? - Investigations of pain indications during mammography relating to compression force and surface area of the compressed breast.
Feder K; Grunert JH
Rofo; 2017 Jan; 189(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 28002858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
