These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27103527)

  • 41. Selective and divided attention modulates auditory-vocal integration in the processing of pitch feedback errors.
    Liu Y; Hu H; Jones JA; Guo Z; Li W; Chen X; Liu P; Liu H
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 42(3):1895-904. PubMed ID: 25969928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Attention to human speakers in a virtual auditory environment: brain potential evidence.
    Nager W; Dethlefsen C; Münte TF
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():164-70. PubMed ID: 18655852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Speech recognition in younger and older adults: a dependency on low-level auditory cortex.
    Harris KC; Dubno JR; Keren NI; Ahlstrom JB; Eckert MA
    J Neurosci; 2009 May; 29(19):6078-87. PubMed ID: 19439585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The impact of attentional training on event-related potentials in older adults.
    Zendel BR; de Boysson C; Mellah S; Démonet JF; Belleville S
    Neurobiol Aging; 2016 Nov; 47():10-22. PubMed ID: 27521754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Electrophysiological correlates of cocktail-party listening.
    Lewald J; Getzmann S
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 292():157-66. PubMed ID: 26092714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Modality-specificity of sensory aging in vision and audition: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ceponiene R; Westerfield M; Torki M; Townsend J
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():53-68. PubMed ID: 18482717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Active listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: an ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention.
    Gherri E; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):832-44. PubMed ID: 20465407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Functional correlates of the speech-in-noise perception impairment in dyslexia: an MRI study.
    Dole M; Meunier F; Hoen M
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jul; 60():103-14. PubMed ID: 24905286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effects of attention and task-relevance on the processing of syntactic violations during listening to two concurrent speech streams.
    Szalárdy O; Tóth B; Farkas D; Kovács A; Urbán G; Orosz G; Szabó BT; Hunyadi L; Hajdu B; Winkler I
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 18(5):932-948. PubMed ID: 29949114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Who said what? The effects of speech tempo on target detection and information extraction in a multi-talker situation: An ERP and functional connectivity study.
    Szalárdy O; Tóth B; Farkas D; Hajdu B; Orosz G; Winkler I
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Mar; 58(3):e13747. PubMed ID: 33314262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise.
    Anderson Gosselin P; Gagné JP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):944-58. PubMed ID: 21060138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cognitive basis of individual differences in speech perception, production and representations: The role of domain general attentional switching.
    Ou J; Law SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Apr; 79(3):945-963. PubMed ID: 28144832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Electrophysiological Correlates of Speaker Segregation and Foreground-Background Selection in Ambiguous Listening Situations.
    Gandras K; Grimm S; Bendixen A
    Neuroscience; 2018 Oct; 389():19-29. PubMed ID: 28735101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of Auditory Attention Training with the Dichotic Listening Task: Behavioural and Neurophysiological Evidence.
    Tallus J; Soveri A; Hämäläinen H; Tuomainen J; Laine M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139318. PubMed ID: 26439112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The focus of attention at the virtual cocktail party--electrophysiological evidence.
    Lambrecht J; Spring DK; Münte TF
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Feb; 489(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 21130840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effects of attention on speech perception: an fMRI study.
    Hugdahl K; Thomsen T; Ersland L; Rimol LM; Niemi J
    Brain Lang; 2003 Apr; 85(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 12681347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Examining age-related differences in auditory attention control using a task-switching procedure.
    Lawo V; Koch I
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2014 Mar; 69(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 23197343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Probing the limits of alpha power lateralisation as a neural marker of selective attention in middle-aged and older listeners.
    Tune S; Wöstmann M; Obleser J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 48(7):2537-2550. PubMed ID: 29430736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.