131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27103645)
1. A Radiographic Diagnostic Reference Level Survey Using Patient and Phantom Data.
Cropp RJ; Seslija P; Thakur Y
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 174(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 27103645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Local diagnostic reference levels for typical radiographic procedures.
Tonkopi E; Daniels C; Gale MJ; Schofield SC; Sorhaindo VA; Vanlarkin JL
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2012 Nov; 63(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 22136965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of entrance surface air kerma due to diagnostic X-ray examinations of adult patients in Uttarakhand, India and establishment of local diagnostic reference levels.
Uniyal SC; Chaturvedi V; Sharma SD; Raghuvanshi S
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Sep; 40(3):687-694. PubMed ID: 28819817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. LOW BMI PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.
Efthymiou FO; Metaxas VI; Dimitroukas CP; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 32043128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of dose-area product of common radiographic examinations towards establishing a preliminary diagnostic reference levels (PDRLs) in Southwestern Nigeria.
Jibiri NN; Olowookere CJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):392-404. PubMed ID: 27929511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of patient doses for routine digital radiography procedures toward establishing an institutional diagnostic reference levels: A case study in Sri Lanka.
Welarathna S; Velautham S; Wanninayake M; Sarasanandarajah S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 23(12):e13852. PubMed ID: 36448529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local reference dose evaluation in conventional radiography examinations in Iran.
Shirin Shandiz M; Bahreyni Toosi MT; Farsi S; Yaghobi K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 15(2):4550. PubMed ID: 24710442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variabilities in X-ray diagnostic reference levels.
Vanaudenhove T; Van Muylem A; Howarth N; Gevenois PA; Tack D
Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4641-4647. PubMed ID: 32270316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography.
Aldrich JE; Duran E; Dunlop P; Mayo JR
J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 16511674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of Local Dose Reference Values for Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusions and Other Occlusions in a High-Volume Catheterization Center.
Maccia C; Malchair F; Gobert I; Louvard Y; Lefevre T
Am J Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 116(8):1179-84. PubMed ID: 26275581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose Optimization in Lumbar Spine Radiographic Examination by Air Gap Method at CR and DR Systems: A Phantom Study.
Chan CTP; Fung KKL
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2015 Mar; 46(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 31052066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DETERMINATION OF DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVEL IN ROUTINE EXAMINATIONS OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY IN MAZANDARAN PROVINCE.
Hoseini Motlagh Z; Shabestani Monfared A; Deevband MR; Abedi-Firouzjah R; Ghaemian N; Abdi R; Ebrahimnejad Gorji K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Aug; 190(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 32491180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method to derive appropriate exposure parameters from target exposure index and patient thickness in pediatric digital radiography.
Zhang M; Liu K; Niu X; Liu X
Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Mar; 43(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 23208532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Light beam diaphragm collimation errors and their effects on radiation dose for pelvic radiography.
Brookfield H; Manning-Stanley A; England A
Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(4):379-91. PubMed ID: 25835404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of four methods for assessing patient effective dose from radiological examinations.
Theocharopoulos N; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2070-9. PubMed ID: 12349928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses for 10 Adult CT Examinations.
Kanal KM; Butler PF; Sengupta D; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Coombs LP; Morin RL
Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):120-133. PubMed ID: 28221093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Local diagnostic reference levels for routine chest X-ray examinations at a public sector hospital in central South Africa.
Junda M; Muller H; Friedrich-Nel H
Health SA; 2021; 26():1622. PubMed ID: 34522394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Establishing national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for computed tomography in Egypt.
Salama DH; Vassileva J; Mahdaly G; Shawki M; Salama A; Gilley D; Rehani MM
Phys Med; 2017 Jul; 39():16-24. PubMed ID: 28711184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic Reference Levels for conventional radiography and fluoroscopy in Austria: Results and updated National Diagnostic Reference Levels derived from a nationwide survey.
Wachabauer D; Röthlin F; Moshammer HM; Homolka P
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():135-139. PubMed ID: 30927937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of gonad shielding in anteroposterior (AP) pelvis projections in an adult: A phantom study utilising digital radiography (DR).
Davies BH; Manning-Stanley AS; Hughes VJ; Ward AJ
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug; 26(3):240-247. PubMed ID: 32089492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
