131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27103645)
21. Dose management for X-ray and CT: systematic comparison of exposition values from two institutes to diagnostic reference levels and use of results for optimisation of exposition.
Schäfer S; Alejandre-Lafont E; Schmidt T; Gizewski ER; Fiebich M; Krombach GA
Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):785-94. PubMed ID: 24691838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Results from a phantom based multi-centre paediatric computed tomography dose survey.
Thiele DL; Aliuddin SE; Irvine M; McGill GP
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2016 Dec; 39(4):885-893. PubMed ID: 27730457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Management of patient doses and diagnostic reference levels in X-ray radiography in Lithuania.
Ziliukas J; Krynke L; Urboniene A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):313-6. PubMed ID: 20211916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Establishment of diagnostic reference levels for dental panoramic radiography in Greece.
Manousaridis G; Koukorava C; Hourdakis CJ; Kamenopoulou V; Yakoumakis E; Tsiklakis K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):111-4. PubMed ID: 25836684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Digital imaging and radiographic practise in diagnostic radiography: An overview of current knowledge and practice in Europe.
Mc Fadden S; Roding T; de Vries G; Benwell M; Bijwaard H; Scheurleer J
Radiography (Lond); 2018 May; 24(2):137-141. PubMed ID: 29605110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Local patient dose diagnostic reference levels in pediatric interventional cardiology in Chile using age bands and patient weight values.
Ubeda C; Miranda P; Vano E
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):615-622. PubMed ID: 28102608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of Projections on Radiation Dose for and Image Quality of Chest Digital Radiography for Children.
Xu H; Liu B; Cai J; Zheng H; Zheng H; Yang Q; Yao C
Curr Med Imaging; 2021; 17(12):1496-1502. PubMed ID: 34264186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic Reference Levels and Monitoring Practice Can Help Reduce Patient Dose From CT Examinations.
Tonkopi E; Duffy S; Abdolell M; Manos D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1073-1081. PubMed ID: 28245142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Patient dose measurements from femoral angiography.
Hoskins PR; Gillespie I; Ireland HM
Br J Radiol; 1996 Dec; 69(828):1159-64. PubMed ID: 9135473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparative study of adult patient doses in film screen and computed radiography in some Sudanese hospitals.
Elshiekh E; Suliman II; Habbani F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):402-5. PubMed ID: 25889604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Patient-Based Dose Audit for Common Radiographic Examinations With Digital Radiology Systems: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Alshamrani KM; Alkenawi AA; Alghamdi BN; Honain RH; Alshehri HA; Alshatiri MO; Mail N; Subahi A; Alsharif SS; Qurashi AA; Aldahery S; Kaifi R
Cureus; 2021 May; 13(5):e15005. PubMed ID: 34150373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Long-term experience and analysis of data on diagnostic reference levels: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
Roch P; Célier D; Dessaud C; Etard C; Rehani MM
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1127-1136. PubMed ID: 31529257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiation dose in digital chest radiography: comparison among three technologies.
Saiani F; Ghirardi C; Rodella CA; Feroldi P; Chiesa A
Radiol Med; 2004 Apr; 107(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 15103291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Development of an online automatic diagnostic reference levels management system for digital radiography: a pilot experience.
Ng CK; Sun Z
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Sep; 103(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 20719401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic reference levels for thorax X-ray examinations of paediatric patients.
Kiljunen T; Järvinen H; Savolainen S
Br J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 80(954):452-9. PubMed ID: 17684076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Patient dose evaluation by means of DICOM images for a direct radiography system.
Rampado O; Garelli E; Zatteri R; Escoffier U; De Lucchi R; Ropolo R
Radiol Med; 2008 Dec; 113(8):1219-28. PubMed ID: 18956145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Determination of Examination-Specific Diagnostic Reference Level in Computed Tomography by A New Quality Control-Based Dose Survey Method.
Parsi M; Sohrabi M; Mianji F; Paydar R
Health Phys; 2018 Mar; 114(3):273-281. PubMed ID: 29360705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
