336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27104240)
1. The underlying number-space mapping among kindergarteners and its relation with early numerical abilities.
Chan WW; Wong TT
J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Aug; 148():35-50. PubMed ID: 27104240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of spatial representation of numbers: a study of the SNARC effect in Chinese children.
Yang T; Chen C; Zhou X; Xu J; Dong Q; Chen C
J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Jan; 117():1-11. PubMed ID: 24121228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
Patro K; Shaki S
Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the spatial-numerical association of response codes effect depend on digits' relative or absolute magnitude? Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task.
Yu S; Li B; Zhang S; Yang T; Jiang T; Chen C; Dong Q
J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(4):415-430. PubMed ID: 30457038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Loudness counts: Interactions between loudness, number magnitude, and space.
Hartmann M; Mast FW
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1305-1322. PubMed ID: 27109592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automaticity of access to numerical magnitude and its spatial associations: The role of task and number representation.
Cleland AA; Bull R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):333-348. PubMed ID: 29708369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Embodied numbers: the role of vision in the development of number-space interactions.
Crollen V; Dormal G; Seron X; Lepore F; Collignon O
Cortex; 2013 Jan; 49(1):276-83. PubMed ID: 22178125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SNARC (spatial-numerical association of response codes) meets SPARC (spatial-pitch association of response codes): Automaticity and interdependency in compatibility effects.
Weis T; Estner B; van Leeuwen C; Lachmann T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1366-83. PubMed ID: 26274895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitudes? Evidence from left spatial neglect.
van Dijck JP; Doricchi F
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 30739136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Instructional Dependency of SNARC Effects Reveals Flexibility of the Space-Magnitude Association of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Magnitudes.
Lee D; Chun J; Cho S
Perception; 2016 May; 45(5):552-67. PubMed ID: 27151510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Developing number-space associations: SNARC effects using a color discrimination task in 5-year-olds.
Hoffmann D; Hornung C; Martin R; Schiltz C
J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Dec; 116(4):775-91. PubMed ID: 24055929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automaticity in processing spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task of Arabic digits in frames.
Yu S; Li B; Zhang M; Gong T; Li X; Li Z; Gao X; Zhang S; Jiang T; Chen C
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229130. PubMed ID: 32092079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands.
Roettger TB; Domahs F
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1231-48. PubMed ID: 25384199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repetition and the SNARC effect with one- and two-digit numbers.
Tan S; Dixon P
Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):84-97. PubMed ID: 21668090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing implicit and synaesthetic number-space associations: Visuospatial and verbal spatial-numerical associations of response codes.
Jonas CN; Spiller MJ; Jansari A; Ward J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1262-73. PubMed ID: 24228728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Time dependency of the SNARC effect for different number formats: evidence from saccadic responses.
Pressigout A; Charvillat A; Mersad K; Doré-Mazars K
Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1485-1495. PubMed ID: 29633009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What information is critical to elicit interference in number-form synaesthesia?
Hubbard EM; Ranzini M; Piazza M; Dehaene S
Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1200-16. PubMed ID: 19698941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
