These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2710437)
1. The living will: does it protect the rights of the terminally ill? Rizzo RF N Y State J Med; 1989 Feb; 89(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 2710437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept? Robertson ED Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):197-214. PubMed ID: 2621091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept? Liacos PJ Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 2621092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The case of Mr. Stevens. Cranford RE Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 1938335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar. Williams SE Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dying at the right time: a critical legal theory approach to timing-of-death issues. Ikuta SS Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(1):3-66. PubMed ID: 2695495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Therefore, choose death. Brown ML Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In thunder, lightning or in rain: what three doctors can do. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 3692804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The right to die. Powell JA; Cohen AS Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 7960664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity. Agrawal A Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial feeding and the right to die. The legal issues. Snyder L J Leg Med; 1988 Sep; 9(3):349-75. PubMed ID: 3147314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Precatory prediction and mindless mimicry: the case of Mary O'Connor. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1988 Dec; 18(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 3147972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The ultimate test of autonomy: should minors have a right to make decisions regarding life-sustaining treatment? Rosato JL Rutgers Law Rev; 1996; 49(1):1-103. PubMed ID: 11865878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Death and life decisions: who is in control? Kenney SC Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 23(3):791-828. PubMed ID: 11652584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The incompetent developmentally disabled person's right of self-determination: right-to-die, sterilization and institutionalization. Krais WA Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):333-61. PubMed ID: 2603868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When is medical treatment "futile"? Bennett AJ Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 8354625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Courts, gender and "the right to die". Miles SH; August A Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(1-2):85-95. PubMed ID: 2374456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Voluntary euthanasia: a proposed remedy. Cole SS; Shea MS Albany Law Rev; 1975; 39(4):826-56. PubMed ID: 11661204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill. Eisenberg KG Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Family surrogate laws: a necessary supplement to living wills and durable powers of attorney. Hamann AA Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(1):103-77. PubMed ID: 11654083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]