BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27104857)

  • 1. Functional Regression Models for Epistasis Analysis of Multiple Quantitative Traits.
    Zhang F; Xie D; Liang M; Xiong M
    PLoS Genet; 2016 Apr; 12(4):e1005965. PubMed ID: 27104857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Epistasis analysis for quantitative traits by functional regression model.
    Zhang F; Boerwinkle E; Xiong M
    Genome Res; 2014 Jun; 24(6):989-98. PubMed ID: 24803592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new statistical framework for genetic pleiotropic analysis of high dimensional phenotype data.
    Wang P; Rahman M; Jin L; Xiong M
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):881. PubMed ID: 27821073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional regression method for whole genome eQTL epistasis analysis with sequencing data.
    Xu K; Jin L; Xiong M
    BMC Genomics; 2017 May; 18(1):385. PubMed ID: 28521784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Leveraging the genetic correlation between traits improves the detection of epistasis in genome-wide association studies.
    Stamp J; DenAdel A; Weinreich D; Crawford L
    G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 37243672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Combined Analysis of Pleiotropy and Epistasis (CAPE).
    Tyler AL; Emerson J; El Kassaby B; Wells AE; Philip VM; Carter GW
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2212():55-67. PubMed ID: 33733350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protocol for Construction of Genome-Wide Epistatic SNP Networks Using WISH-R Package.
    Kadarmideen HN; Carmelo VAO
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2212():155-168. PubMed ID: 33733355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. WISH-R- a fast and efficient tool for construction of epistatic networks for complex traits and diseases.
    Carmelo VAO; Kogelman LJA; Madsen MB; Kadarmideen HN
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 19(1):277. PubMed ID: 30064383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epistasis: obstacle or advantage for mapping complex traits?
    Verhoeven KJ; Casella G; McIntyre LM
    PLoS One; 2010 Aug; 5(8):e12264. PubMed ID: 20865037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting epistasis with the marginal epistasis test in genetic mapping studies of quantitative traits.
    Crawford L; Zeng P; Mukherjee S; Zhou X
    PLoS Genet; 2017 Jul; 13(7):e1006869. PubMed ID: 28746338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of SNP epistasis effects of quantitative traits using an extended Kempthorne model.
    Mao Y; London NR; Ma L; Dvorkin D; Da Y
    Physiol Genomics; 2006 Dec; 28(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16940430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-Stage Testing for Epistasis: Screening and Verification.
    Pecanka J; Jonker MA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2212():69-92. PubMed ID: 33733351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of Epistasis in Natural Traits Using Model Organisms.
    Campbell RF; McGrath PT; Paaby AB
    Trends Genet; 2018 Nov; 34(11):883-898. PubMed ID: 30166071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A strategy to apply quantitative epistasis analysis on developmental traits.
    Labocha MK; Yuan W; Aleman-Meza B; Zhong W
    BMC Genet; 2017 May; 18(1):42. PubMed ID: 28506208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying quantitative trait locus by genetic background interactions in association studies.
    Jannink JL
    Genetics; 2007 May; 176(1):553-61. PubMed ID: 17179077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are Interactions between cis-Regulatory Variants Evidence for Biological Epistasis or Statistical Artifacts?
    Fish AE; Capra JA; Bush WS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Oct; 99(4):817-830. PubMed ID: 27640306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison study of multivariate fixed models and Gene Association with Multiple Traits (GAMuT) for next-generation sequencing.
    Chiu CY; Jung J; Wang Y; Weeks DE; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE; Amos CI; Mills JL; Boehnke M; Xiong M; Fan R
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 41(1):18-34. PubMed ID: 27917525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factorizing polygenic epistasis improves prediction and uncovers biological pathways in complex traits.
    Tang D; Freudenberg J; Dahl A
    Am J Hum Genet; 2023 Nov; 110(11):1875-1887. PubMed ID: 37922884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multivariate analysis of regulatory SNPs: empowering personal genomics by considering cis-epistasis and heterogeneity.
    Turner SD; Bush WS
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2011; ():276-87. PubMed ID: 21121055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rare variant association test with multiple phenotypes.
    Lee S; Won S; Kim YJ; Kim Y; ; Kim BJ; Park T
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 41(3):198-209. PubMed ID: 28039885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.