These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

480 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27104931)

  • 1. In vitro analysis of the fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia molar crowns with different occlusal thickness.
    Sorrentino R; Triulzio C; Tricarico MG; Bonadeo G; Gherlone EF; Ferrari M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():328-333. PubMed ID: 27104931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness.
    Nakamura K; Harada A; Inagaki R; Kanno T; Niwano Y; Milleding P; Örtengren U
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015; 73(8):602-8. PubMed ID: 25635734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns.
    Sun T; Zhou S; Lai R; Liu R; Ma S; Zhou Z; Longquan S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():93-101. PubMed ID: 24762856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Occlusal Thickness and Cement-Type Effects on Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Posterior Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.
    Bulut AC; Atsü SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(3):485-491. PubMed ID: 34115062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strength of CAD/CAM-generated esthetic ceramic molar implant crowns.
    Wolf D; Bindl A; Schmidlin PR; Lüthy H; Mörmann WH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 18807555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance evaluation of CAD/CAM zirconia and composite primary molar crowns with different occlusal thicknesses.
    Bolaca A; Erdoğan Y
    J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2024; 22():22808000241235994. PubMed ID: 38420920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns.
    Ellakwa A; Raj T; Deeb S; Ronaghi G; Martin FE; Klineberg I
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An
    Narayanan V; Narayanan V; Devanarayanan SA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Feb; 21(2):183-189. PubMed ID: 32381825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture strength of lithium disilicate crowns compared to polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network and zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns.
    Sieper K; Wille S; Kern M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct; 74():342-348. PubMed ID: 28662443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
    Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of core thickness differences on post-fatigue indentation fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns.
    Alhasanyah A; Vaidyanathan TK; Flinton RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 23387466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crowns and veneered zirconia crowns as a posterior implant restoration.
    Kim JH; Lee SJ; Park JS; Ryu JJ
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23296031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of zirconia surveyed crowns with four different occlusal rest seat designs.
    Jurado CA; Sayed Ahmed A; Lawson NC; Azpiazu-Flores FX; Green C; Cho SH
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):484-489. PubMed ID: 37471621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations.
    Beuer F; Schweiger J; Eichberger M; Kappert HF; Gernet W; Edelhoff D
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramic and veneered zirconia molar crowns after aging in a mastication simulator.
    Bankoğlu Güngör M; Karakoca Nemli S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):473-480. PubMed ID: 28645670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of fracture resistance and fracture characterization of bilayered zirconia/fluorapatite and monolithic lithium disilicate all ceramic crowns.
    Altamimi AM; Tripodakis AP; Eliades G; Hirayama H
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 24757702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monolithic zirconia dental crowns. Internal fit, margin quality, fracture mode and load at fracture.
    Schriwer C; Skjold A; Gjerdet NR; Øilo M
    Dent Mater; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 28662859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture characteristics and translucency of multilayer monolithic zirconia crowns of various thicknesses.
    Kang CM; Hsu WC; Chen MS; Wu HY; Mine Y; Peng TY
    J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():105023. PubMed ID: 38670331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultra-thin occlusal veneers bonded to enamel and made of ceramic or hybrid materials exhibit load-bearing capacities not different from conventional restorations.
    Ioannidis A; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Benic GI
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Feb; 90():433-440. PubMed ID: 30447557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.