These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27104997)

  • 1. The Evolution of Sex-Specific Dominance in Response to Sexually Antagonistic Selection.
    Spencer HG; Priest NK
    Am Nat; 2016 May; 187(5):658-66. PubMed ID: 27104997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex-dependent dominance at a single locus maintains variation in age at maturity in salmon.
    Barson NJ; Aykanat T; Hindar K; Baranski M; Bolstad GH; Fiske P; Jacq C; Jensen AJ; Johnston SE; Karlsson S; Kent M; Moen T; Niemelä E; Nome T; Næsje TF; Orell P; Romakkaniemi A; Sægrov H; Urdal K; Erkinaro J; Lien S; Primmer CR
    Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7582):405-8. PubMed ID: 26536110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations Near Sexually Antagonistic Genes.
    Connallon T; Jordan CY
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Aug; 6(8):2273-84. PubMed ID: 27226163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meiotic drive influences the outcome of sexually antagonistic selection at a linked locus.
    Patten MM
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Nov; 27(11):2360-70. PubMed ID: 25293344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex-specific recombination rates and allele frequencies affect the invasion of sexually antagonistic variation on autosomes.
    Wyman MJ; Wyman MC
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Nov; 26(11):2428-37. PubMed ID: 24070143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fitness consequences of sex-specific selection.
    Connallon T; Cox RM; Calsbeek R
    Evolution; 2010 Jun; 64(6):1671-82. PubMed ID: 20050912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antagonistic pleiotropy in species with separate sexes, and the maintenance of genetic variation in life-history traits and fitness.
    Zajitschek F; Connallon T
    Evolution; 2018 Jun; 72(6):1306-1316. PubMed ID: 29667189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella.
    Lewis Z; Wedell N; Hunt J
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2085-97. PubMed ID: 21729062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection.
    Kasimatis KR; Ralph PL; Phillips PC
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Nov; 9(11):3813-3824. PubMed ID: 31530636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex-Specific Selection and the Evolution of Between-Sex Genetic Covariance.
    McGlothlin JW; Cox RM; Brodie ED
    J Hered; 2019 Jul; 110(4):422-432. PubMed ID: 31095325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict.
    Cox RM; Calsbeek R
    Am Nat; 2009 Feb; 173(2):176-87. PubMed ID: 19138156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid divergent evolution of sexual morphology: comparative tests of antagonistic coevolution and traditional female choice.
    Eberhard WG
    Evolution; 2004 Sep; 58(9):1947-70. PubMed ID: 15521454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intralocus sexual conflict.
    van Doorn GS
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun; 1168():52-71. PubMed ID: 19566703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual conflict and speciation.
    Parker GA; Partridge L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 353(1366):261-74. PubMed ID: 9533125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The maintenance of polygenic sex determination depends on the dominance of fitness effects which are predictive of the role of sexual antagonism.
    Meisel RP
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 33930135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic correlations and sex-specific adaptation in changing environments.
    Connallon T; Hall MD
    Evolution; 2016 Oct; 70(10):2186-2198. PubMed ID: 27477129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The intricate relationship between sexually antagonistic selection and the evolution of sex chromosome fusions.
    Matsumoto T; Kitano J
    J Theor Biol; 2016 Sep; 404():97-108. PubMed ID: 27259387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental evolution reveals sex-specific dominance for surviving bacterial infection in laboratory populations of
    Geeta Arun M; Agarwala A; Syed ZA; Jigisha ; Kashyap M; Venkatesan S; Chechi TS; Gupta V; Prasad NG
    Evol Lett; 2021 Dec; 5(6):657-671. PubMed ID: 34919096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Climatic factors and species range position predict sexually antagonistic selection across taxa.
    De Lisle SP; Goedert D; Reedy AM; Svensson EI
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 373(1757):. PubMed ID: 30150216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is sexual conflict an "engine of speciation"?
    Gavrilets S
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol; 2014 Nov; 6(12):a017723. PubMed ID: 25395295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.