222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2710617)
1. Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification.
Henderson JM; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
Percept Psychophys; 1989 Mar; 45(3):196-208. PubMed ID: 2710617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying objects across saccades: effects of extrafoveal preview and flanker object context.
Henderson JM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 May; 18(3):521-30. PubMed ID: 1534353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of spatial location in integration of pictorial information across saccades.
Pollatsek A; Rayner K; Henderson JM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Feb; 16(1):199-210. PubMed ID: 2137518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of foveal priming and extrafoveal preview on object identification.
Henderson JM; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 Aug; 13(3):449-63. PubMed ID: 2958593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming.
Morgan JL; Meyer AS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):428-42. PubMed ID: 15910129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Object-scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm.
Võ ML; Henderson JM
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1742-53. PubMed ID: 21607814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extrafoveal preview benefit during free-viewing visual search in the monkey.
Krishna BS; Ipata AE; Bisley JW; Gottlieb J; Goldberg ME
J Vis; 2014 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 24403392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.
Võ ML; Henderson JM
J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is attention necessary for object identification? Evidence from eye movements during the inspection of real-world scenes.
Underwood G; Templeman E; Lamming L; Foulsham T
Conscious Cogn; 2008 Mar; 17(1):159-70. PubMed ID: 17222564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The extrafoveal preview paradigm as a measure of predictive, active sampling in visual perception.
Huber-Huber C; Buonocore A; Melcher D
J Vis; 2021 Jul; 21(7):12. PubMed ID: 34283203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extrafoveal Processing in Categorical Search for Geometric Shapes: General Tendencies and Individual Variations.
Dreneva A; Shvarts A; Chumachenko D; Krichevets A
Cogn Sci; 2021 Aug; 45(8):e13025. PubMed ID: 34379345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting.
Abrams RA; Law MB
Percept Psychophys; 2000 May; 62(4):818-33. PubMed ID: 10883587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The acquisition of parafoveal word information in reading.
Blanchard HE; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 2755766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shifts of visual attention at fixation and away from fixation.
Saarinen J
Vision Res; 1993 May; 33(8):1113-7. PubMed ID: 8506649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retinal eccentricity and the detection of targets.
Meinecke C
Psychol Res; 1989; 51(3):107-16. PubMed ID: 2608862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The time course of name retrieval during multiple-object naming: evidence from extrafoveal-on-foveal effects.
Malpass D; Meyer AS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):523-37. PubMed ID: 20192547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensory factors are insufficient to define the ocular saccade goal in complex visual fields.
Lévy-Schoen A; Coëffé C; Jacobs AM
Brain Behav Evol; 1989; 33(2-3):80-4. PubMed ID: 2758306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of viewing time, fixations, and viewing strategies on visual memory for briefly presented natural objects.
Huebner GM; Gegenfurtner KR
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1398-413. PubMed ID: 20043271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Synchronizing visual and language processing: an effect of object name length on eye movements.
Zelinsky GJ; Murphy GL
Psychol Sci; 2000 Mar; 11(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 11273419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences.
Tsai JL; Lee CY; Tzeng OJ; Hung DL; Yen NS
Brain Lang; 2004 Nov; 91(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 15485712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
