These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2710619)

  • 1. Spatial S-R compatibility with orthogonal stimulus-response relationship.
    Ehrenstein WH; Schroeder-Heister P; Heister G
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Mar; 45(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 2710619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus-response compatibility for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: evidence for spatial coding.
    Weeks DJ; Proctor RW; Beyak B
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 May; 48(2):367-83. PubMed ID: 7610272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects?
    Ladavas E; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 6232340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Iacoboni M; Woods RP; Mazziotta JC
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):321-31. PubMed ID: 8836228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neglect determined by the relative location of responses.
    Làdavas E; Farnè A; Carletti M; Zeloni G
    Brain; 1994 Aug; 117 ( Pt 4)():705-14. PubMed ID: 7922458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial S-R compatibility with unimanual two-finger choice reactions: effects of irrelevant stimulus location.
    Heister G; Ehrenstein WH; Schroeder-Heister P
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Aug; 42(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 3627940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proprioception and stimulus-response compatibility.
    Worringham CJ; Kerr GK
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 10718064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position.
    Matsumoto E; Misaki M; Miyauchi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15029467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline.
    Nicoletti R; Anzola GP; Luppino G; Rizzolatti G; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Oct; 8(5):664-73. PubMed ID: 6218228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Stoffer TH
    Psychol Res; 1991; 53(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 1946872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus-response compatibilities between vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: the effects of hand position and posture.
    Michaels CF; Schilder S
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Apr; 49(4):342-8. PubMed ID: 2030931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response-response compatibility during bimanual movements: evidence for the conceptual coding of action.
    Hazeltine E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):682-8. PubMed ID: 16447382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of response eccentricity and relative position on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility with joystick and keypress responses.
    Proctor RW; Cho YS
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 12613566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthogonal cross-task compatibility: abstract spatial coding in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Joucoeur P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 17546730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of visual-verbal load and spatial compatibility on stimulus response.
    Huang WS; Hsu CC; Liu CC; Lai CH
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Apr; 108(2):487-502. PubMed ID: 21675563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Lamberts K; Tavernier G; d'Ydewalle G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1992 Mar; 79(2):115-30. PubMed ID: 1598842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring handedness asymmetries in the Simon effect.
    Seibold JC; Chen J; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):437-51. PubMed ID: 26676871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Coding specificity of orthogonal S-R compatibility].
    Kleinsorge T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(4):249-64. PubMed ID: 10551040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.