201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27106193)
1. The Cost Implications in Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia of Early Versus Delayed External Cephalic Version in the Early External Cephalic Version 2 (EECV2) Trial.
Ahmed RJ; Gafni A; Hutton EK;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Mar; 38(3):235-245.e3. PubMed ID: 27106193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term.
Hutton EK; Hofmeyr GJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jan; (1):CD000084. PubMed ID: 16437421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.
Bin YS; Roberts CL; Nicholl MC; Ford JB
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):244. PubMed ID: 28747173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery.
Reinhard J; Sänger N; Hanker L; Reichenbach L; Yuan J; Herrmann E; Louwen F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 23183715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Early External Cephalic Version (ECV) 2 Trial: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial of timing of ECV for breech pregnancies.
Hutton EK; Hannah ME; Ross SJ; Delisle MF; Carson GD; Windrim R; Ohlsson A; Willan AR; Gafni A; Sylvestre G; Natale R; Barrett Y; Pollard JK; Dunn MS; Turtle P;
BJOG; 2011 Apr; 118(5):564-77. PubMed ID: 21291506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External cephalic version beginning at 34 weeks' gestation versus 37 weeks' gestation: a randomized multicenter trial.
Hutton EK; Kaufman K; Hodnett E; Amankwah K; Hewson SA; McKay D; Szalai JP; Hannah ME
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 189(1):245-54. PubMed ID: 12861170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Successful external cephalic version is an independent factor for caesarean section during trial of labor - a matched controlled study.
Boujenah J; Fleury C; Bonneau C; Pharisien I; Tigaizin A; Carbillon L
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 46(10):737-742. PubMed ID: 28951278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18 years' experience.
Melo P; Georgiou EX; Hedditch A; Ellaway P; Impey L
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 30223309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Labour Outcomes After Successful External Cephalic Version Compared With Spontaneous Cephalic Version.
Krueger S; Simioni J; Griffith LE; Hutton EK;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Jan; 40(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 28780214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of external cephalic version for breech pregnancy and mode of delivery for breech and twin pregnancy: a survey of Canadian practitioners.
Hutton EK; Hannah ME; Barrett J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Oct; 24(10):804-10. PubMed ID: 12399807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Amnioinfusion for women with a singleton breech presentation and a previous failed external cephalic version: a randomized controlled trial.
Diguisto C; Winer N; Descriaud C; Tavernier E; Weymuller V; Giraudeau B; Perrotin F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Apr; 31(8):993-999. PubMed ID: 28279119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation in diagnosis of non-cephalic presentation.
De Castro H; Ciobanu A; Formuso C; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):248-256. PubMed ID: 31671470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Impact of the external cephalic version on the obstetrical prognosis in a team with a high success rate of vaginal delivery in breech presentation].
Coppola C; Mottet N; Mariet AS; Baeza C; Poitrey E; Bourtembourg A; Ramanah R; Riethmuller D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Oct; 45(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 27125381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls.
Balayla J; Dahdouh EM; Villeneuve S; Boucher M; Gauthier RJ; Audibert F; Fuchs F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Mar; 28(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 24853490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of the external cephalic version in breech delivery. Dutch national implementation study of external cephalic version.
Vlemmix F; Rosman AN; Fleuren MA; Rijnders ME; Beuckens A; Haak MC; Akerboom BM; Bais JM; Kuppens SM; Papatsonis DN; Opmeer BC; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2010 May; 10():20. PubMed ID: 20459717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation.
de Gregorio N; Friedl T; Schramm A; Reister F; Janni W; Ebner F
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(5):477-481. PubMed ID: 28848185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of success of external cephalic version and cephalic presentation at birth among 1253 women with non-cephalic presentation using logistic regression and classification tree analyses.
Hutton EK; Simioni JC; Thabane L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Aug; 96(8):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 28449212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version after a previous caesarean delivery: A systematic review.
Zhang N; Ward H
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Oct; 61(5):650-657. PubMed ID: 34169515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Fewer caesarean sections for breech presentation following external cephalic version according to a protocol in a special office visit].
Kuppens SM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Huibers M; Franssen MJ; de Becker BM; Wijnen HA; Pop VJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jun; 152(23):1323-8. PubMed ID: 18661859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation.
Tan JM; Macario A; Carvalho B; Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2010 Jan; 10():3. PubMed ID: 20092630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
