BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27106193)

  • 21. [Cord accident after external cephalic version: Reality or mostly myth?].
    Boujenah J; Fleury C; Pharisien I; Benbara A; Tigaizin A; Bricou A; Carbillon L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Jan; 45(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 28238321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors associated with the success of external cephalic version (ECV) of breech presentation at term.
    Obeidat N; Lataifeh I; Al-Khateeb M; Zayed F; Khriesat W; Amarin Z
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2011; 38(4):386-9. PubMed ID: 22268281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A decision analytical cost analysis of offering ECV in a UK district general hospital.
    James M; Hunt K; Burr R; Johanson R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2001; 1():6. PubMed ID: 11472641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.
    Ebner F; Friedl TW; Leinert E; Schramm A; Reister F; Lato K; Janni W; DeGregorio N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):749-55. PubMed ID: 26437955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fetal heart rate abnormalities during and after external cephalic version: Which fetuses are at risk and how are they delivered?
    Kuppens SM; Smailbegovic I; Houterman S; de Leeuw I; Hasaart TH
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):363. PubMed ID: 29041923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Success rates of early versus late initiation of external cephalic version.
    Lavie A; Reicher L; Avraham S; Ram M; Maslovitz S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Apr; 145(1):116-121. PubMed ID: 30706464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. External cephalic version - A 10-year review of practice.
    Hakem E; Lindow SW; O'Connell MP; von Bünau G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():414-417. PubMed ID: 33550216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: predictors of success, and impact on the rate of caesarean section.
    Hussin OA; Mahmoud MA; Abdel-Fattah MM
    East Mediterr Health J; 2013 Feb; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 23516827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Brief report: a cost analysis of neuraxial anesthesia to facilitate external cephalic version for breech fetal presentation.
    Carvalho B; Tan JM; Macario A; El-Sayed YY; Sultan P
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Jul; 117(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 23592608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland.
    Wise MR; Sadler L; Ansell D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 19032661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cost-effectiveness of breech version by acupuncture-type interventions on BL 67, including moxibustion, for women with a breech foetus at 33 weeks gestation: a modelling approach.
    van den Berg I; Kaandorp GC; Bosch JL; Duvekot JJ; Arends LR; Hunink MG
    Complement Ther Med; 2010 Apr; 18(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 20430289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. This baby is not for turning: Women's experiences of attempted external cephalic version.
    Watts NP; Petrovska K; Bisits A; Catling C; Homer CS
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16(1):248. PubMed ID: 27561416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rebozo and External Cephalic Version in breech presentation (RECEIVE): A randomised controlled study.
    de Wolff MG; Ladekarl M; Sparholt L; Lykke JA
    BJOG; 2022 Sep; 129(10):1666-1675. PubMed ID: 35114058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
    Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study.
    Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Ensing S; Opmeer BC; Te Hoven S; Velzel J; de Hundt M; van den Berg S; Rota H; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
    Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():44-8. PubMed ID: 27321719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. External cephalic version of non-cephalic presentation; is it worthwhile?
    Gottvall T; Ginstman C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Dec; 90(12):1443-5. PubMed ID: 21682700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Association of Persistent Breech Presentation With External Cephalic Version Success.
    Lauterbach R; Bachar G; Ben-David C; Matanes E; Ginsberg Y; Beloosesky R; Ganem N; Weiner Z; Zipori Y
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 137(2):258-262. PubMed ID: 33416280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Late preterm versus term external cephalic version: an audit of a single obstetrician experience.
    Levin G; Rottenstreich A; Weill Y; Pollack RN
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Oct; 300(4):875-880. PubMed ID: 31312960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implementation of external cephalic version in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study.
    Vlemmix F; Rosman AN; te Hoven S; van de Berg S; Fleuren MA; Rijnders ME; Beuckens A; Opmeer BC; Mol BW; Kok M
    Birth; 2014 Dec; 41(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 25288341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Association of external cephalic version before term with late preterm birth.
    Poole KL; McDonald SD; Griffith LE; Hutton EK;
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Aug; 96(8):998-1005. PubMed ID: 28414857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.