These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2710628)

  • 1. Further tests of an exemplar-similarity approach to relating identification and categorization.
    Nosofsky RM
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Apr; 45(4):279-90. PubMed ID: 2710628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification, and recognition.
    Nosofsky RM; Clark SE; Shin HJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):282-304. PubMed ID: 2522517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization.
    Maddox WT; Ashby FG
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jan; 53(1):49-70. PubMed ID: 8433906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory.
    Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):3-27. PubMed ID: 1826320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrating information from separable psychological dimensions.
    Ashby FG; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):598-612. PubMed ID: 2144574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarity, identification, and categorization: comment on Ashby and Lee (1991).
    Nosofsky RM; Smith JE
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1992 Jun; 121(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 1534835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.
    Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1986 Mar; 115(1):39-61. PubMed ID: 2937873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting similarity and categorization from identification.
    Ashby FG; Lee WW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1991 Jun; 120(2):150-72. PubMed ID: 1830609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli.
    Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Jan; 13(1):87-108. PubMed ID: 2949055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Given versus induced category representations: use of prototype and exemplar information in classification.
    Medin DL; Altom MW; Murphy TD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jul; 10(3):333-52. PubMed ID: 6235306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of similarity and practice on speeded classification response times and accuracies: further tests of an exemplar-retrieval model.
    Nosofsky RM; Alfonso-Reese LA
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):78-93. PubMed ID: 10087858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Separating perceptual processes from decisional processes in identification and categorization.
    Maddox WT
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Oct; 63(7):1183-200. PubMed ID: 11766943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of category variability in perceptual categorization.
    Stewart N; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):893-907. PubMed ID: 12219797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Similarity-scaling studies of dot-pattern classification and recognition.
    Shin HJ; Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1992 Sep; 121(3):278-304. PubMed ID: 1402702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization.
    Palmeri TJ; Nosofsky RM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):197-235. PubMed ID: 11216316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli.
    Ashby FG; Gott RE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Jan; 14(1):33-53. PubMed ID: 2963894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Form categorization in 10-month-olds.
    Colombo J; McCollam K; Coldren JT; Mitchell DW; Rash SJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1990 Apr; 49(2):173-88. PubMed ID: 2332720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developmental differences in the use of prototype and exemplar-specific information.
    Hayes BK; Taplin JE
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Jun; 55(3):329-52. PubMed ID: 8315374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli.
    Stewart N; Brown GD; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11831211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An on-line investigation of prototype and exemplar strategies in classification.
    Malt BC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 2526852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.