These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

582 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27106698)

  • 1. Coronary in-stent restenosis: predisposing clinical and stent-related factors, diagnostic performance and analyses of inaccuracies in 320-row computed tomography angiography.
    Wan YL; Tsay PK; Chen CC; Juan YH; Huang YC; Chan WH; Wen MS; Hsieh IC
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 32 Suppl 1():105-15. PubMed ID: 27106698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis.
    Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Vliegenthart R; Duguay TM; Stubenrauch AC; Rosenberg RD; Varga-Szemes A; Bayer RR; Yang J; Ebersberger U; Baquet M; Jochheim D; Hoffmann E; Steinberg DH; Chiaramida SA; Schoepf UJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):377-83. PubMed ID: 27431607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: value of subtraction coronary computed tomography angiography.
    Amanuma M; Kondo T; Sano T; Takayanagi T; Matsutani H; Sekine T; Arai T; Morita H; Ishizaka K; Arakita K; Iwasa A; Takase S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr; 32(4):661-70. PubMed ID: 26662268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis.
    de Graaf FR; Schuijf JD; van Velzen JE; Boogers MJ; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Reiber JH; Sieders A; Spanó F; Jukema JW; Schalij MJ; van der Wall EE; Bax JJ
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 20404736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using third-generation dual-source CT for ruling out in-stent restenosis.
    Eckert J; Renczes-Janetzko P; Schmidt M; Magedanz A; Voigtländer T; Schmermund A
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2019 Apr; 108(4):402-410. PubMed ID: 30187179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent patency using 64-slice computed tomography.
    Zhao J; Zheng LL; Yang Y
    Coron Artery Dis; 2011 Dec; 22(8):540-52. PubMed ID: 21959714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictors for functionally significant in-stent restenosis: an integrated analysis using coronary angiography, IVUS, and myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Kang SJ; Cho YR; Park GM; Ahn JM; Han SB; Lee JY; Kim WJ; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Mintz GS; Park SJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1183-90. PubMed ID: 24229771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rationale and design of advantage (additional diagnostic value of CT perfusion over coronary CT angiography in stented patients with suspected in-stent restenosis or coronary artery disease progression) prospective study.
    Andreini D; Mushtaq S; Pontone G; Conte E; Sonck J; Collet C; Guglielmo M; Baggiano A; Trabattoni D; Galli S; Montorsi P; Ferrari C; Fabbiocchi F; De Martini S; Annoni A; Mancini ME; Formenti A; Magatelli M; Resta M; Consiglio E; Muscogiuri G; Fiorentini C; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(5):411-417. PubMed ID: 29933938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT angiography for detection of in-stent restenosis of vertebral artery ostium stents: comparison with conventional angiography.
    Lee YJ; Lim YS; Lim HW; Yoo WJ; Choi BG; Kim BS
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):1000-7. PubMed ID: 24107930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic value of myocardial SPECT to detect in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation.
    Park HE; Koo BK; Park KW; Paeng JC; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim HS
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Dec; 28(8):2125-34. PubMed ID: 22395666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis by 64-section computed tomography: factors affecting assessment and accurate diagnosis.
    Chung SH; Kim YJ; Hur J; Lee HJ; Choe KO; Kim TH; Choi BW
    J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Feb; 25(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 20160604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of 64-detector row computed tomography for evaluation of intracoronary stents in symptomatic patients with suspected in-stent restenosis.
    Manghat N; Van Lingen R; Hewson P; Syed F; Kakani N; Cox I; Roobottom C; Morgan-Hughes G
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 101(11):1567-73. PubMed ID: 18489934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Diagnostic value of 320-slice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis].
    Wang J; Chen XM; Wang SH; Ye HH; Cui HB; Du WP; Zhou HL; Feng MJ; Pan YN; Lin SY
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 40(6):487-91. PubMed ID: 22943643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New quantitative method to diagnose coronary in-stent restenosis by 64-multislice computed tomography.
    Yoshimura M; Nao T; Miura T; Okada M; Nakashima Y; Fujimura T; Okamura T; Yamada J; Matsunaga N; Matsuzaki M; Yano M
    J Cardiol; 2015 Jan; 65(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 24846389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CT Perfusion Versus Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Suspected In-Stent Restenosis or CAD Progression.
    Andreini D; Mushtaq S; Pontone G; Conte E; Collet C; Sonck J; D'Errico A; Di Odoardo L; Guglielmo M; Baggiano A; Trabattoni D; Ravagnani P; Montorsi P; Teruzzi G; Olivares P; Fabbiocchi F; De Martini S; Calligaris G; Annoni A; Mancini ME; Formenti A; Magatelli M; Consiglio E; Muscogiuri G; Lombardi F; Fiorentini C; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Mar; 13(3):732-742. PubMed ID: 31422127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary CT Angiography for the Evaluation of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds.
    Collet C; Chevalier B; Cequier A; Fajadet J; Dominici M; Helqvist S; Van Boven AJ; Dudek D; McClean D; Almeida M; Piek JJ; Tenekecioglu E; Bartorelli A; Windecker S; Serruys PW; Onuma Y
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 11(5):722-732. PubMed ID: 28734923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of stent diameter and length on in-stent restenosis after DES vs BMS implantation in patients needing large coronary stents-A clinical and health-economic evaluation.
    Zbinden R; von Felten S; Wein B; Tueller D; Kurz DJ; Reho I; Galatius S; Alber H; Conen D; Pfisterer M; Kaiser C; Eberli FR
    Cardiovasc Ther; 2017 Feb; 35(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 27662632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of in-stent neoatherosclerosis and tissue characteristics between early and late in-stent restenosis in second-generation drug-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomography study.
    Sabbah M; Kadota K; El-Eraky A; Kamal HM; Abdellah AT; El Hawary A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 33(10):1463-1472. PubMed ID: 28444549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in the detection of coronary artery in-stent restenosis: evidence from an updated meta-analysis.
    Dai T; Wang JR; Hu PF
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1373-1382. PubMed ID: 29124384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of everolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of drug-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent restenosis.
    Almalla M; Pross V; Marx N; Hoffmann R
    Coron Artery Dis; 2012 Nov; 23(7):492-6. PubMed ID: 22990414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.