These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27107164)
1. Monte Carlo uncertainty assessment of ultrasonic beam parameters from immersion transducers used to non-destructive testing. Alvarenga AV; Silva CE; Costa-Félix RP Ultrasonics; 2016 Jul; 69():144-51. PubMed ID: 27107164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of the initial beam parameters in Monte Carlo linac simulation. Aljarrah K; Sharp GC; Neicu T; Jiang SB Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):850-8. PubMed ID: 16696460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of ISO-GUM and Monte Carlo methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty: application to direct cadmium measurement in water by GFAAS. Theodorou D; Meligotsidou L; Karavoltsos S; Burnetas A; Dassenakis M; Scoullos M Talanta; 2011 Feb; 83(5):1568-74. PubMed ID: 21238753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monte Carlo calculations of kQ, the beam quality conversion factor. Muir BR; Rogers DW Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5939-50. PubMed ID: 21158307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte carlo electron source model validation for an Elekta Precise linac. Ali OA; Willemse CA; Shaw W; O'Reilly FH; du Plessis FC Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2366-73. PubMed ID: 21776771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan for a static and dynamic 6 MV photon beam. Magaddino V; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Schmidhalter D; Hirschi L; Fix MK Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 21239148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of film measurements and Monte Carlo simulations of dose delivered with very high-energy electron beams in a polystyrene phantom. Bazalova-Carter M; Liu M; Palma B; Dunning M; McCormick D; Hemsing E; Nelson J; Jobe K; Colby E; Koong AC; Tantawi S; Dolgashev V; Maxim PG; Loo BW Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1606-13. PubMed ID: 25832051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On Monte Carlo modeling of megavoltage photon beams: a revisited study on the sensitivity of beam parameters. Chibani O; Moftah B; Ma CM Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):188-201. PubMed ID: 21361187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accounting for the fringe magnetic field from the bending magnet in a Monte Carlo accelerator treatment head simulation. O'Shea TP; Foley MJ; Faddegon BA Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3260-9. PubMed ID: 21815400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nondestructive testing ultrasonic immersion probe assessment and uncertainty evaluation according to EN 12668-2:2010. Silva CE; Alvarenga AV; Costa-Felix RP IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Oct; 59(10):2338-46. PubMed ID: 23143583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements. Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte Carlo simulation of TrueBeam flattening-filter-free beams using varian phase-space files: comparison with experimental data. Belosi MF; Rodriguez M; Fogliata A; Cozzi L; Sempau J; Clivio A; Nicolini G; Vanetti E; Krauss H; Khamphan C; Fenoglietto P; Puxeu J; Fedele D; Mancosu P; Brualla L Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051707. PubMed ID: 24784373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The determination of beam quality correction factors: Monte Carlo simulations and measurements. González-Castaño DM; Hartmann GH; Sánchez-Doblado F; Gómez F; Kapsch RP; Pena J; Capote R Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4723-41. PubMed ID: 19622853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of uncertainties in the CT conversion algorithm when predicting proton beam ranges in patients from dose and PET-activity distributions. España S; Paganetti H Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7557-71. PubMed ID: 21098912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accurate Monte Carlo simulations for nozzle design, commissioning and quality assurance for a proton radiation therapy facility. Paganetti H; Jiang H; Lee SY; Kooy HM Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2107-18. PubMed ID: 15305464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Angular dependence of the response of the nanoDot OSLD system for measurements at depth in clinical megavoltage beams. Lehmann J; Dunn L; Lye JE; Kenny JW; Alves AD; Cole A; Asena A; Kron T; Williams IM Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061712. PubMed ID: 24877807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integration and evaluation of automated Monte Carlo simulations in the clinical practice of scanned proton and carbon ion beam therapy. Bauer J; Sommerer F; Mairani A; Unholtz D; Farook R; Handrack J; Frey K; Marcelos T; Tessonnier T; Ecker S; Ackermann B; Ellerbrock M; Debus J; Parodi K Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(16):4635-59. PubMed ID: 25079387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo simulation of MOSFET dosimeter for electron backscatter using the GEANT4 code. Chow JC; Leung MK Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2383-90. PubMed ID: 18649471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and commissioning of a Monte Carlo photon beam model for the forthcoming clinical trials in microbeam radiation therapy. Martínez-Rovira I; Sempau J; Prezado Y Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):119-31. PubMed ID: 22225281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric evaluation of a dedicated stereotactic linear accelerator using measurement and Monte Carlo simulation. Heydarian M; Asnaashari K; Allahverdi M; Jaffray DA Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):3943-54. PubMed ID: 18841845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]