290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27107473)
1. A new classification of mandibular asymmetry and evaluation of surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion.
Chen YJ; Yao CC; Chang ZC; Lai HH; Lu SC; Kok SH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 44(6):676-83. PubMed ID: 27107473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cross-sectional study on three-dimensional compensatory characteristics of maxillary teeth in patients with different types of skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.
Li J; Liu Y; Ge X; Liu Z; Guan H; Wang L; Ma W
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):4973-4985. PubMed ID: 37417986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Type of mandibular asymmetry affects changes and outcomes of bimaxillary surgery for class III asymmetry.
Liu LC; Chen YA; Chen RF; Yao CF; Liao YF; Chen YR
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):1077-1088. PubMed ID: 34338893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of facial asymmetry in skeletal Class III malocclusion and its implications for treatment.
Chen YJ; Yao CC; Chang ZC; Lai HH; Yeh KJ; Kok SH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 48(12):1533-1541. PubMed ID: 31235392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation analysis of three-dimensional changes of hard and soft tissues in class III orthognathic surgery patients using cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee TY; Kim KH; Yu HS; Kim KD; Jung YS; Baik HS
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1530-40. PubMed ID: 25006925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dentoskeletal parameters related to visual perception of facial asymmetry in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion after orthognathic surgery.
Lin CW; Wang YC; Chen YH; Ko EW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 47(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 28822677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved lip esthetics in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry after isolated mandibular orthognathic surgery.
Xu W; Tan H; Meng X; Huang Y; Cao L; Zheng L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 May; 161(5):e407-e415. PubMed ID: 34996662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional surgical simulation produce better surgical outcomes among patients with class III facial asymmetry?
Udomlarptham N; Lin CH; Wang YC; Ko EW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1022-1031. PubMed ID: 29606563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular characteristics in patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion and chin deviation.
Lv W; Nie Q; Gu Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Sep; 160(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 34175163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Augmented corticotomy combined with accelerated orthodontic forces in class III orthognathic patients: morphologic aspects of the mandibular anterior ridge with cone-beam computed tomography.
Coscia G; Coscia V; Peluso V; Addabbo F
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(10):1760.e1-9. PubMed ID: 23773424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comprehensive Analysis of Mandibular Residual Asymmetry after Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Correction of Menton Point Deviation.
Lin H; Zhu P; Lin Q; Huang X; Xu Y; Yang X
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161601. PubMed ID: 27571364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Condylar positional changes up to 12 months after bimaxillary surgery for skeletal class III malocclusions.
Kim YJ; Lee Y; Chun YS; Kang N; Kim SJ; Kim M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):145-56. PubMed ID: 24071374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry.
Ueki K; Moroi A; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Marukawa K; Yoshizawa K; Kato K; Kawashiri S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):821-7. PubMed ID: 22507292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical Stability After Proximal Segment Angle Alteration in Patients With Class III Facial Asymmetry.
Lee SF; Chen YA; Lin CH; Wen-Ching Ko E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jun; 81(6):734-745. PubMed ID: 37011882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioral soft tissue change after isolated mandibular surgery for asymmetry patients.
Jeon EG; Lee ST; Kwon TG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):962-968. PubMed ID: 28363504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental changes in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry after surgical-orthodontic treatment.
Ming Y; Hu Y; Wang T; Zhang J; Li Y; Xu W; Tan H; Ye H; Zheng L
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(4):783-798. PubMed ID: 32417830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Site and severity of facial asymmetry after bimaxillary surgery for class III deformity: a case-control study.
Wang TH; Chen YF; Chen YA; Yao CF; Xi T; Liao YF; Chen YR
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):334. PubMed ID: 38780816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maxillofacial Features Related to Mandibular Asymmetries in Skeletal Class III Patients.
Thiesen G; Gribel BF; Kim KB; Freitas MPM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 May; 75(5):1015-1025. PubMed ID: 28012844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
