These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27107709)

  • 1. Energy saving in WWTP: Daily benchmarking under uncertainty and data availability limitations.
    Torregrossa D; Schutz G; Cornelissen A; Hernández-Sancho F; Hansen J
    Environ Res; 2016 Jul; 148():330-337. PubMed ID: 27107709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benchmarking of energy consumption in municipal wastewater treatment plants - a survey of over 200 plants in Italy.
    Vaccari M; Foladori P; Nembrini S; Vitali F
    Water Sci Technol; 2018 May; 77(9-10):2242-2252. PubMed ID: 29757176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benchmarking of municipal waste water treatment plants (an Austrian project).
    Lindtner S; Kroiss H; Nowak O
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):265-71. PubMed ID: 15553485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A systematic approach for the comparative assessment of stormwater pollutant removal potentials.
    Scholes L; Revitt DM; Ellis JB
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Aug; 88(3):467-78. PubMed ID: 17462814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data evaluation of full-scale wastewater treatment plants by mass balance.
    Puig S; van Loosdrecht MC; Colprim J; Meijer SC
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(18):4645-55. PubMed ID: 18786694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using bioprocess stoichiometry to build a plant-wide mass balance based steady-state WWTP model.
    Ekama GA
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(8):2101-20. PubMed ID: 19345392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Operating costs and energy demand of wastewater treatment plants in Austria: benchmarking results of the last 10 years.
    Haslinger J; Lindtner S; Krampe J
    Water Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 74(11):2620-2626. PubMed ID: 27973366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic methodology for the robust quantification of energy efficiency at wastewater treatment plants featuring Data Envelopment Analysis.
    Longo S; Hospido A; Lema JM; Mauricio-Iglesias M
    Water Res; 2018 Sep; 141():317-328. PubMed ID: 29804018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Energy benchmarking of South Australian WWTPs.
    Krampe J
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(9):2059-66. PubMed ID: 23656950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benchmarking leachate co-treatment strategies in municipal wastewater treatment plants under dynamic conditions and energy prices.
    Dereli RK; Giberti M; Liu Q; Flynn D; Casey E
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 260():110129. PubMed ID: 32090828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benchmarking energy consumption in municipal wastewater treatment plants in Japan.
    Mizuta K; Shimada M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(10):2256-62. PubMed ID: 21076210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Energy benchmarking in wastewater treatment plants: the importance of site operation and layout.
    Belloir C; Stanford C; Soares A
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(1-4):260-9. PubMed ID: 25413121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In-line fast OUR (oxygen uptake rate) measurements for monitoring and control of WWTP.
    Baeza JA; Gabriel D; Lafuente J
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):19-28. PubMed ID: 11936633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Energy efficiency in wastewater treatment plants: A framework for benchmarking method selection and application.
    Longo S; Hospido A; Mauricio-Iglesias M
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Oct; 344():118624. PubMed ID: 37473556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benchmark simulation models, quo vadis?
    Jeppsson U; Alex J; Batstone DJ; Benedetti L; Comas J; Copp JB; Corominas L; Flores-Alsina X; Gernaey KV; Nopens I; Pons MN; Rodríguez-Roda I; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA; Volcke EI; Vrecko D
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 23823534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benchmarks for the energy demand of nutrient removal plants.
    Nowak O
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):125-32. PubMed ID: 12926679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the effluent quality parameters of wastewater treatment plant based on uncertainty analysis and post-processing approaches (case study).
    Hejabi N; Saghebian SM; Aalami MT; Nourani V
    Water Sci Technol; 2021 Apr; 83(7):1633-1648. PubMed ID: 33843748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benchmarking of large municipal wastewater treatment plants treating over 100,000 PE in Austria.
    Lindtner S; Schaar H; Kroiss H
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1487-93. PubMed ID: 18520003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On-line estimation and detection of abnormal substrate concentrations in WWTPs using a software sensor: a benchmark study.
    Benazzi F; Gernaey KV; Jeppsson U; Katebi R
    Environ Technol; 2007 Aug; 28(8):871-82. PubMed ID: 17879846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Energy audit in small wastewater treatment plants: methodology, energy consumption indicators, and lessons learned.
    Foladori P; Vaccari M; Vitali F
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(6):1007-15. PubMed ID: 26360762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.