BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27107855)

  • 21. The EZ diffusion method: too EZ?
    Ratcliff R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1218-28. PubMed ID: 19001593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Processing Lexical and Speaker Information in Repetition and Semantic/Associative Priming.
    Lee CY; Zhang Y
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Feb; 47(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 28752195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Associative priming and conflict differentially affect two processes underlying cognitive control: Evidence from reaching behavior.
    Erb CD; McBride AG; Marcovitch S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1400-1410. PubMed ID: 30859477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. EZ does it! Extensions of the EZ-diffusion model.
    Wagenmakers EJ; van der Maas HL; Dolan CV; Grasman RP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1229-35. PubMed ID: 19001594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task.
    Perea M; Rosa E
    Psychol Res; 2002 Aug; 66(3):180-94. PubMed ID: 12192447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Test-retest reliability of an emotion maintenance task.
    Broome R; Gard DE; Mikels JA
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(4):737-47. PubMed ID: 22077723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The kinds of information that support novel associative object priming and how these differ from those that support item priming.
    Gomes CA; Mayes A
    Memory; 2015; 23(6):901-27. PubMed ID: 25051200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The EZ diffusion model provides a powerful test of simple empirical effects.
    van Ravenzwaaij D; Donkin C; Vandekerckhove J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):547-556. PubMed ID: 27352898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Good test--retest reliability for standard and advanced false-belief tasks across a wide range of abilities.
    Hughes C; Adlam A; Happé F; Jackson J; Taylor A; Caspi A
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2000 May; 41(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 10836678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Putting it all together: a unified account of word recognition and reaction-time distributions.
    Norris D
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):207-19. PubMed ID: 19159154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A diffusion decision model analysis of evidence variability in the lexical decision task.
    Tillman G; Osth AF; van Ravenzwaaij D; Heathcote A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1949-1956. PubMed ID: 28265864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Test-retest reliability of five frequently used executive tasks in healthy adults.
    Soveri A; Lehtonen M; Karlsson LC; Lukasik K; Antfolk J; Laine M
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2018; 25(2):155-165. PubMed ID: 28001452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Additive and interactive effects in semantic priming: Isolating lexical and decision processes in the lexical decision task.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Tan SE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 22612169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reliable affordances: A generative modeling approach for test-retest reliability of the affordances task.
    Littman R; Hochman S; Kalanthroff E
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1984-1993. PubMed ID: 37127802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.
    Ratcliff R; Tuerlinckx F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Sep; 9(3):438-81. PubMed ID: 12412886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule.
    Starns JJ; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Examination of the Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test Battery.
    Nakayama Y; Covassin T; Schatz P; Nogle S; Kovan J
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 42(8):2000-5. PubMed ID: 24907286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Concussion Test: CNS Vital Signs.
    Littleton AC; Register-Mihalik JK; Guskiewicz KM
    Sports Health; 2015; 7(5):443-7. PubMed ID: 26502421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Test-retest reliability of N400 event-related brain potential measures in a word-pair semantic priming paradigm in patients with schizophrenia.
    Boyd JE; Patriciu I; McKinnon MC; Kiang M
    Schizophr Res; 2014 Sep; 158(1-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 25015029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test in Baseline Concussion Testing of High School Athletes.
    MacDonald J; Duerson D
    Clin J Sport Med; 2015 Jul; 25(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 25061807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.