163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27107877)
1. Partial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard.
Karch A; Koch A; Zapf A; Zerr I; Karch A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 78():73-82. PubMed ID: 27107877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies.
Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N
Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Verification and classification bias interactions in diagnostic test accuracy studies for fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
Schmidt RL; Walker BS; Cohen MB
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Mar; 123(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 25521425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
van Smeden M; Oberski DL; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK; Moons KG; de Groot JA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Reference standards in diagnostic research: problems and solutions].
de Groot JA; Reitsma JB; Moons K
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 159():A7202. PubMed ID: 25589276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
Walsh T
J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recognising bias in studies of diagnostic tests part 2: interpreting and verifying the index test.
Kea B; Hall MK; Wang R
Emerg Med J; 2019 Aug; 36(8):501-505. PubMed ID: 31221671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited.
de Groot JA; Janssen KJ; Zwinderman AH; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5880-9. PubMed ID: 18752256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present.
Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2711-21. PubMed ID: 12939781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
Collins J; Huynh M
Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4141-69. PubMed ID: 24910172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests must take into account the use of surrogate standards.
Kang J; Brant R; Ghali WA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):566-574.e1. PubMed ID: 23466018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.
Lu Y; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2532-43. PubMed ID: 20799249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Verification bias in pediatric studies evaluating diagnostic tests.
Bates AS; Margolis PA; Evans AT
J Pediatr; 1993 Apr; 122(4):585-90. PubMed ID: 8463905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests.
Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
Biometrics; 2003 Mar; 59(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 12762453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Biases in diagnostic test studies: impact on estimating sensitivity and specificity].
Rendón-Macías ME; Valenzuela M; Villasís-Keever MÁ
Rev Alerg Mex; 2020; 67(2):165-173. PubMed ID: 32892530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining biomarker trajectories to improve diagnostic accuracy in prospective cohort studies with verification bias.
Li H; Gatsonis C
Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(11):1968-1990. PubMed ID: 30590870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recognising Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests Part 1: Patient Selection.
Hall MK; Kea B; Wang R
Emerg Med J; 2019 Jul; 36(7):431-434. PubMed ID: 31302605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the agreement and diagnostic accuracy of two diagnostic tests when one test is conducted on only a subsample of specimens.
Katki HA; Li Y; Edelstein DW; Castle PE
Stat Med; 2012 Feb; 31(5):436-48. PubMed ID: 22139832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Understanding the direction of bias in studies of diagnostic test accuracy.
Kohn MA; Carpenter CR; Newman TB
Acad Emerg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1194-206. PubMed ID: 24238322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correcting for partial verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies: A tutorial using R.
Arifin WN; Yusof UK
Stat Med; 2022 Apr; 41(9):1709-1727. PubMed ID: 35043447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
