These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27108291)

  • 21. Gradient-based electrical conductivity imaging using MR phase.
    Gurler N; Ider YZ
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jan; 77(1):137-150. PubMed ID: 26762771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Numerical simulation of SAR and B1-field inhomogeneity of shielded RF coils loaded with the human head.
    Chen J; Feng Z; Jin JM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 May; 45(5):650-9. PubMed ID: 9581064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The use of MR B+1 imaging for validation of FDTD electromagnetic simulations of human anatomies.
    Van den Berg CA; Bartels LW; van den Bergen B; Kroeze H; de Leeuw AA; Van de Kamer JB; Lagendijk JJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4735-46. PubMed ID: 16985267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Developments in Electrical-Property Tomography Based on the Contrast-Source Inversion Method.
    Leijsen R; Fuchs P; Brink W; Webb A; Remis R
    J Imaging; 2019 Feb; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 34460473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of B1 field profiles and SAR values for multi-strut transverse electromagnetic RF coils in high field MRI applications.
    Ibrahim TS; Abduljalil AM; Baertlein BA; Lee R; Robitaill PM
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Oct; 46(10):2545-55. PubMed ID: 11686274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Magnetic resonance electrical property mapping at 21.1 T: a study of conductivity and permittivity in phantoms, ex vivo tissue and in vivo ischemia.
    Amouzandeh G; Mentink-Vigier F; Helsper S; Bagdasarian FA; Rosenberg JT; Grant SC
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Feb; 65(5):055007. PubMed ID: 31307020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [A Review of Electrical Property Tomography for Human Tissues].
    Li H; Shen S; Yan D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 33(5):998-1004. PubMed ID: 29714957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy and precision of electrical permittivity mapping at 3T: the impact of three
    Gavazzi S; van den Berg CAT; Sbrizzi A; Kok HP; Stalpers LJA; Lagendijk JJW; Crezee H; van Lier ALHMW
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Jun; 81(6):3628-3642. PubMed ID: 30737816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Technical note: Multi-receiver combination method for phase-based electrical property tomography of the breast.
    Kim JH; Shin J; Jung KJ; Cui C; Kim SY; Lee JH; Kim DH
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1660-1669. PubMed ID: 36585806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A new approach for electrical properties estimation using a global integral equation and improvements using high permittivity materials.
    Schmidt R; Webb A
    J Magn Reson; 2016 Jan; 262():8-14. PubMed ID: 26679289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Feasibility of electric property tomography of pelvic tumors at 3T.
    Balidemaj E; van Lier AL; Crezee H; Nederveen AJ; Stalpers LJ; van den Berg CA
    Magn Reson Med; 2015 Apr; 73(4):1505-13. PubMed ID: 24777618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. SAR prediction in adults and children by combining measured B1+ maps and simulations at 7.0 Tesla.
    Tiberi G; Costagli M; Biagi L; Ciantis AD; Fontana N; Stara R; Symms MR; Cosottini M; Guerrini R; Tosetti M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):1048-55. PubMed ID: 27042956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A novel method to decrease electric field and SAR using an external high dielectric sleeve at 3 T head MRI: numerical and experimental results.
    Park BS; Rajan SS; Guag JW; Angelone LM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Apr; 62(4):1063-9. PubMed ID: 25347873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A memory efficient method of calculating specific absorption rate in CW FDTD simulations.
    Furse CM; Gandhi OP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 May; 43(5):558-60. PubMed ID: 8849469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Magnetic resonance electric property imaging of brain tissues.
    Zhang X; Zhu S; He B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():4432-5. PubMed ID: 19963831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. SAR and temperature: simulations and comparison to regulatory limits for MRI.
    Wang Z; Lin JC; Mao W; Liu W; Smith MB; Collins CM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Aug; 26(2):437-41. PubMed ID: 17654736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparative numerical study of rotating and stationary RF coils in terms of flip angle and specific absorption rate for 7 T MRI.
    Trakic A; Jin J; Li MY; McClymont D; Weber E; Liu F; Crozier S
    J Magn Reson; 2013 Nov; 236():70-82. PubMed ID: 24076497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. RF safety assessment of a bilateral four-channel transmit/receive 7 Tesla breast coil: SAR versus tissue temperature limits.
    Fiedler TM; Ladd ME; Bitz AK
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):143-157. PubMed ID: 28102957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Deep learning-based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch-based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data.
    Gavazzi S; van den Berg CAT; Savenije MHF; Kok HP; de Boer P; Stalpers LJA; Lagendijk JJW; Crezee H; van Lier ALHMW
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Nov; 84(5):2772-2787. PubMed ID: 32314825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.