These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27108291)

  • 61. Statistical shape model-based reconstruction of a scaled, patient-specific surface model of the pelvis from a single standard AP x-ray radiograph.
    Zheng G
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1424-39. PubMed ID: 20443464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Magnetic resonance driven electrical impedance tomography: a simulation study.
    Negishi M; Tong T; Constable RT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Mar; 30(3):828-37. PubMed ID: 21147595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. MR-based electrical property tomography using a modified finite difference scheme.
    Liu C; Jin J; Guo L; Li M; Tesiram Y; Chen H; Liu F; Xin X; Crozier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145013. PubMed ID: 29897046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Simultaneous Quantitative Imaging of Electrical Properties and Proton Density From B
    Jiaen Liu ; Van de Moortele PF; Xiaotong Zhang ; Yicun Wang ; Bin He
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2064-2073. PubMed ID: 28005010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Electrical conductivity imaging using magnetic resonance tomography.
    Katscher U; Voigt T; Findeklee C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3162-4. PubMed ID: 19964612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. B1 field, SAR, and SNR comparisons for birdcage, TEM, and microstrip coils at 7T.
    Wang C; Shen GX
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Aug; 24(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 16786582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Assessment of induced SAR in children exposed to electromagnetic plane waves between 10 MHz and 5.6 GHz.
    Bakker JF; Paulides MM; Christ A; Kuster N; van Rhoon GC
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(11):3115-30. PubMed ID: 20463374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The effect of simulation strategies on prediction of power deposition in the tissue around electronic implants during magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nguyen BT; Pilitsis J; Golestanirad L
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 65(18):185007. PubMed ID: 32756027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. High field body MR imaging: preliminary experiences.
    Uematsu H; Takahashi M; Dougherty L; Hatabu H
    Clin Imaging; 2004; 28(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 15158217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. B1(+) phase mapping at 7 T and its application for in vivo electrical conductivity mapping.
    van Lier AL; Brunner DO; Pruessmann KP; Klomp DW; Luijten PR; Lagendijk JJ; van den Berg CA
    Magn Reson Med; 2012 Feb; 67(2):552-61. PubMed ID: 21710613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Numerical assessment of the reduction of specific absorption rate by adding high dielectric materials for fetus MRI at 3 T.
    Luo M; Hu C; Zhuang Y; Chen W; Liu F; Xin SX
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2016 Aug; 61(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 26985683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Initial analysis of SAR from a cell phone inside a vehicle by numerical computation.
    Anzaldi G; Silva F; Fernández M; Quílez M; Riu PJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 May; 54(5):921-30. PubMed ID: 17518290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Magnetic field distribution in the presence of paramagnetic plates in magnetic resonance imaging: a combined numerical and experimental study.
    Mertens P; Machann J; Mueller-Bierl B; Steidle G; Bellemann ME; Schick F
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1777-84. PubMed ID: 18561652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Error analysis of nonconstant admittivity for MR-based electric property imaging.
    Seo JK; Kim MO; Lee J; Choi N; Woo EJ; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Kim DH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Feb; 31(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 21990329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A feasibility study of magnetic resonance driven electrical impedance tomography using a phantom.
    Wan Y; Negishi M; Constable RT
    Physiol Meas; 2013 Jun; 34(6):623-44. PubMed ID: 23719063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Electromagnetic Properties and the Basis for CDI, MREIT, and EPT.
    Sadleir R; Gabriel C; Minhas AS
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2022; 1380():1-16. PubMed ID: 36306092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Ultra fast electromagnetic field computations for RF multi-transmit techniques in high field MRI.
    van den Bergen B; Stolk CC; Berg JB; Lagendijk JJ; Van den Berg CA
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(5):1253-64. PubMed ID: 19182321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. [Research of the influences on the electromagnetic fields by the pelvic tissues in the design of the radio frequency coils].
    Han J; Li Y; Xin X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 30(4):849-53. PubMed ID: 24059069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm.
    Kwon O; Woo EJ; Yoon JR; Seo JK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Feb; 49(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 12066883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. In vivo electric conductivity of cervical cancer patients based on B₁⁺ maps at 3T MRI.
    Balidemaj E; de Boer P; van Lier AL; Remis RF; Stalpers LJ; Westerveld GH; Nederveen AJ; van den Berg CA; Crezee J
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 61(4):1596-607. PubMed ID: 26836010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.