These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27108354)

  • 21. Uniqueness in the forensic identification sciences--fact or fiction?
    Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Mar; 206(1-3):12-8. PubMed ID: 20832209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I--A quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence.
    Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1180-4. PubMed ID: 21884119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In search of a free movement of forensic evidence: Towards minimum standards to determine evidence admissibility?
    Depauw S
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2020 Aug; 74():102021. PubMed ID: 32769042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effective use of forensic science in volume crime investigations: identifying recurring themes in the literature.
    Ludwig A; Fraser J
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jan; 54(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 24438782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of forensic case data in intelligence-led policing: the example of drug profiling.
    Morelato M; Beavis A; Tahtouh M; Ribaux O; Kirkbride P; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Mar; 226(1-3):1-9. PubMed ID: 23379982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What do the experts know? Calibration, precision, and the wisdom of crowds among forensic handwriting experts.
    Martire KA; Growns B; Navarro DJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2346-2355. PubMed ID: 29667124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Criminal court expert reports].
    Fontaine L
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2011 Apr; 112(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 20688347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The current status of forensic science laboratory accreditation in Europe.
    Malkoc E; Neuteboom W
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):121-6. PubMed ID: 16876355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nature and place of crime scene management within forensic sciences.
    Crispino F
    Sci Justice; 2008 Mar; 48(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 18450214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Probabilistic reasoning in the law. Part 1: Assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of DNA evidence.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 9800432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of the forensic expert in criminal procedures according to Belgian Law.
    Vermylen Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):8-13. PubMed ID: 20471763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Forensic cultures in historical perspective: technologies of witness, testimony, judgment (and justice?).
    Hamlin C
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 23040200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect.
    Martire KA; Kemp RI; Sayle M; Newell BR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jul; 240():61-8. PubMed ID: 24814330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Representation and re-presentation in litigation science.
    Jasanoff S
    Environ Health Perspect; 2008 Jan; 116(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 18197311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science.
    Saks MJ; Koehler JJ
    Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5736):892-5. PubMed ID: 16081727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attorney beliefs concerning scientific evidence and expert witness credibility.
    Wechsler HJ; Kehn A; Wise RA; Cramer RJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 41():58-66. PubMed ID: 25869850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lay understanding of forensic statistics: Evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents.
    Thompson WC; Newman EJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):332-49. PubMed ID: 25984887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The communication of forensic science in the criminal justice system: A review of theory and proposed directions for research.
    Howes LM
    Sci Justice; 2015 Mar; 55(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 25754001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The end of the (forensic science) world as we know it? The example of trace evidence.
    Roux C; Talbot-Wright B; Robertson J; Crispino F; Ribaux O
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.