These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27108354)

  • 41. Probabilistic reasoning in the law. Part 2: Assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of trace evidence other than DNA.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 9800433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of forensic evidence on criminal justice case processing.
    Peterson JL; Hickman MJ; Strom KJ; Johnson DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58 Suppl 1():S78-90. PubMed ID: 23106604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Forensic science: A judicial perspective.
    Rakoff JS; Liu G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Oct; 120(41):e2301838120. PubMed ID: 37782784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Fuzzy logic in urology. How to reason in inaccurate terms].
    Vírseda Chamorro M; Salinas Casado J; Vázquez Alba D
    Arch Esp Urol; 2004 May; 57(4):365-76. PubMed ID: 15270278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Case histories as evidence.
    Herxheimer A; Healy D; Menkes DB
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2012; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 22436256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The legal framework for more robust forensic science evidence.
    Rt Hon. the Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evidence evaluation: a response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T.
    Berger CE; Buckleton J; Champod C; Evett IW; Jackson G
    Sci Justice; 2011 Jun; 51(2):43-9. PubMed ID: 21605824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The influence of Forensic Advisors on the use of forensic science in the Belgian criminal justice system.
    Bitzer S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Mar; 296():123-131. PubMed ID: 30716551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Learning in practice for becoming a professional forensic expert.
    Köpsén S; Nyström S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):208-15. PubMed ID: 22727266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. LTDNA Evidence on Trial.
    Roberts P
    Front Genet; 2016; 7():180. PubMed ID: 27826316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Describing disease processes using a probabilistic logic of qualitative time.
    van der Heijden M; Lucas PJ
    Artif Intell Med; 2013 Nov; 59(3):143-55. PubMed ID: 24183893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cooperation between law enforcement officers and forensic specialists. Diagnosis and possible improvements - a Lithuanian experience.
    Malewski H; Kurapka VE; Matulienė S; Navickienė Ž
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2016; 66(3):182-210. PubMed ID: 28453171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Scenario-Entity Analysis based on an entity-relationship model: Revisiting crime reconstruction.
    Wang L; Jia M; Peng C; Ni S; Shen S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109923. PubMed ID: 31437758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Language consistency: a missing link in theory, research and reasoning?
    Webber PB
    J Adv Nurs; 2010 Jan; 66(1):218-27. PubMed ID: 20423446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Presenting evidence for the court.
    Hartigan-Go K
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2012; 24(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 22436261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Novel scientific methods in court.
    Hackman L; Nic Daeid N
    Emerg Top Life Sci; 2021 Sep; 5(3):349-357. PubMed ID: 34402863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Science in the court: pitfalls, challenges and solutions.
    O'Brien É; Nic Daeid N; Black S
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. "Certainty" and expert mental health opinions in legal proceedings.
    Drogin EY; Commons ML; Gutheil TG; Meyer DJ; Norris DM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(5-6):348-53. PubMed ID: 23022469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A forensic science perspective on the role of images in crime investigation and reconstruction.
    Milliet Q; Delémont O; Margot P
    Sci Justice; 2014 Dec; 54(6):470-80. PubMed ID: 25498936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Helping with inquiries or helping with profits? The trials and tribulations of a technology of forensic reasoning.
    Lawless CJ; Williams R
    Soc Stud Sci; 2010 Oct; 40(5):731-55. PubMed ID: 21553603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.