These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27108354)
61. Turf wars: authority and responsibility for the investigation of mass graves. Skinner M; Sterenberg J Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jul; 151(2-3):221-32. PubMed ID: 15939156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. [Scientific investigation in a criminal affair - the interest of a scientific coordinator]. Schuliar Y Med Sci (Paris); 2011 Feb; 27(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 21382333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The Sydney Declaration - An unique opportunity for Africa. Olckers A; Ben Khelil M Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Apr; 357():111969. PubMed ID: 38428217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Equal prior probabilities: can one do any better? Biedermann A; Taroni F; Garbolino P Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Oct; 172(2-3):85-93. PubMed ID: 17267153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Analysing and exemplifying forensic conclusion criteria in terms of Bayesian decision theory. Biedermann A; Bozza S; Taroni F Sci Justice; 2018 Mar; 58(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 29526268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Bayesian networks for evaluation of evidence from forensic entomology. Andersson MG; Sundström A; Lindström A Biosecur Bioterror; 2013 Sep; 11 Suppl 1():S64-77. PubMed ID: 23971824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Forensic science in the context of Islamic law: A review. Alkahtani T; Aljerian K; Golding B; Alqahtani S J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Aug; 34():179-81. PubMed ID: 26165681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion Association of Forensic Science Providers. Willis S Sci Justice; 2010 Mar; 50(1):49. PubMed ID: 20408380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Label the limits of forensic science. Mejia R Nature; 2017 Apr; 544(7648):7. PubMed ID: 28383000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Cognitive IT-systems for big data analysis in medicine. Isakova J Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S108-9. PubMed ID: 26639685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Demonstrating reliability through transparency: A scientific validity framework to assist scientists and lawyers in criminal proceedings. Carr S; Piasecki E; Gallop A Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Mar; 308():110110. PubMed ID: 31959481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Forensic advisers working for all district courts and courts of appeal in the Netherlands: An overview and discussion. Meeuwissen J; de Roo R; Kruithof-van Esch J; van der Heijden S; Claushuis M; van Blijswijk-Kieftenbeld L; Remijn W J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):182-188. PubMed ID: 37747081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. A cultural change to enable improved decision-making in forensic science: A six phased approach. Earwaker H; Nakhaeizadeh S; Smit NM; Morgan RM Sci Justice; 2020 Jan; 60(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 31924294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. On the likelihood of "encapsulating all uncertainty". Martire KA; Edmond G; Navarro DJ; Newell BR Sci Justice; 2017 Jan; 57(1):76-79. PubMed ID: 28063591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. [Nephrology: knowledge and digital memory]. Sancipriano GP G Ital Nefrol; 2016; 33(3):. PubMed ID: 27374396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Implementing statistical learning methods through Bayesian networks. Part 1: a guide to Bayesian parameter estimation using forensic science data. Biedermann A; Taroni F; Bozza S Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Dec; 193(1-3):63-71. PubMed ID: 19833464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. [Science and law in courts]. Tallacchini M Epidemiol Prev; 2014; 38(3-4):159-63. PubMed ID: 25115466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Forensic scientists' conclusions: how readable are they for non-scientist report-users? Howes LM; Kirkbride KP; Kelty SF; Julian R; Kemp N Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Sep; 231(1-3):102-12. PubMed ID: 23890623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. The effect of following best practice reporting recommendations on legal and community evaluations of forensic examiners reports. Summersby S; Edmond G; Kemp RI; Ballantyne KN; Martire KA Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jun; 359():112034. PubMed ID: 38704924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]