These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2710967)

  • 1. [A method of calculating photon dose equivalent based on the revised technical standards of the Radiologic Protection Law (1)--conversion from absorbed dose in air to dose equivalent in shielding calculations].
    Tanaka S; Suzuki T
    Radioisotopes; 1989 Feb; 38(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 2710967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A calculational method of photon dose equivalent based on the revised technical standards of radiological protection law (No. 2)].
    Tanaka S; Suzuki T
    Radioisotopes; 1989 Mar; 38(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 2740533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shielding calculations below 100kVp in concrete-equivalent materials.
    Christensen RC
    Health Phys; 1979 Jan; 36(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 422381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of photon scatter and consequent electron build-up in air on the calculation of dose equivalent quantities in the ICRU sphere for photon energies from 0.662 to 10 MeV.
    Dimbylow PJ; Francis TM
    Phys Med Biol; 1983 Jul; 28(7):817-28. PubMed ID: 6611656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of shielding calculations for diagnostic X-ray equipment].
    Noto K; Sota T; Koshida K; Suzuki S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Aug; 59(8):976-83. PubMed ID: 12960951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Leakage through gaps around shielding windows in radiotherapy treatment rooms.
    Dean MH; Stedeford B
    Phys Med Biol; 1984 Jun; 29(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 6463105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of experimental and calculated shielding factors for modular buildings in a radioactive fallout scenario.
    Hinrichsen Y; Finck R; Östlund K; Rääf C; Andersson KG
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Sep; 189():146-155. PubMed ID: 29673949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A conversion method of air kerma from the primary, scatter, and leakage radiations to effective dose for calculating x-ray shielding barriers in mammography.
    Kharrati H
    Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1367-74. PubMed ID: 15984688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple equivalent tissue-air ratio method for calculating absorbed dose in a heterogeneous medium.
    Tatcher M; Palti S
    Radiology; 1983 Feb; 146(2):527-9. PubMed ID: 6849101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effective quality factors for neutrons based on the revised ICRP/ICRU recommendations.
    Veinot KG; Hertel NE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16381781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personal dose-equivalent conversion coefficients for 1252 radionuclides.
    Otto T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jan; 168(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 25349458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A procedure for determining the dose distribution behind block shields. II. Calculation of the dose distribution of 60Co radiation fields using a pencil beam model].
    Gerlach R; Kranepuhl H
    Radiobiol Radiother (Berl); 1989; 30(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 2772154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dose rates to staff in the event of failure of beam-control mechanism in cobalt-60 units.
    Binks C
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Jan; 53(625):43-4. PubMed ID: 7353092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Relation of the quality coefficient and linear transmission of energy as new standards of radiation safety].
    Avetisov GM; Gubin AT; Keirim-Markus IB; Lystsov VN; Obaturov GM
    Gig Sanit; 1988 Oct; (10):32-6. PubMed ID: 3234777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laminated primary ceiling barriers for medical accelerator rooms.
    McGinley PH; Butker EK
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Sep; 39(9):1331-6. PubMed ID: 15552107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conversion coefficients from fluence and air kerma to dose equivalent quantities.
    Rossiter MJ
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Mar; 63(747):230. PubMed ID: 2334839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The efficacy of lead shielding in megavoltage radiotherapy.
    Marrs JE; Hounsell AR; Wilkinson JM
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Feb; 66(782):140-4. PubMed ID: 8457827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose equivalent rate constants and barrier transmission data for nuclear medicine facility dose calculations and shielding design.
    Kusano M; Caldwell CB
    Health Phys; 2014 Jul; 107(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 24849904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effective Dose Rate Coefficients for Immersions in Radioactive Air and Water.
    Bellamy MB; Veinot KG; Hiller MM; Dewji SA; Eckerman KF; Easterly CE; Hertel NE; Leggett RW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 174(2):275-286. PubMed ID: 27150517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Primary Standard of Absorbed Dose to Water in High-energy Photon Beam Irradiation].
    Shimizu M
    Igaku Butsuri; 2014; 34(3):154-61. PubMed ID: 26288882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.