These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27109694)
1. Modelling effluent quality based on a real-time optical monitoring of the wastewater treatment process. Tomperi J; Koivuranta E; Kuokkanen A; Leiviskä K Environ Technol; 2017 Jan; 38(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 27109694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Real-time optical monitoring of the wastewater treatment process. Tomperi J; Koivuranta E; Kuokkanen A; Juuso E; Leiviskä K Environ Technol; 2016; 37(3):344-51. PubMed ID: 26238162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monitoring and evaluation of the efficiency of a mixed textile-domestic wastewater treatment plant for 3 years. Çağatay Çetinkaya M; Üstün GE Environ Monit Assess; 2022 May; 194(6):430. PubMed ID: 35562507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wastewater treatment plant performance assessment using time-function-based effluent quality index and multiple regression models: the case of Bahir Dar textile factory. Wondim TT; Dzwairo RB; Aklog D; Janka E; Samarakoon G; Dereseh MM Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Oct; 195(11):1360. PubMed ID: 37870654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review. Bal AS; Dhagat NN Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hydrolytic anaerobic reactor and aerated constructed wetland systems for municipal wastewater treatment - HIGHWET project. Pascual A; de la Varga D; Arias CA; Van Oirschot D; Kilian R; Álvarez JA; Soto M Environ Technol; 2017 Jan; 38(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27241268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic programming expressions for effluent quality prediction: Towards AI-driven monitoring and management of wastewater treatment plants. Elsayed A; Ghaith M; Yosri A; Li Z; El-Dakhakhni W J Environ Manage; 2024 Apr; 356():120510. PubMed ID: 38490009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Descriptive and multivariate analyses of four Tunisian wastewater treatment plants: A comparison between different treatment processes and their efficiency improvement. Boujelben I; Samet Y; Messaoud M; Ben Makhlouf M; Maalej S J Environ Manage; 2017 Feb; 187():63-70. PubMed ID: 27883940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative image analysis as a robust tool to assess effluent quality from an aerobic granular sludge system treating industrial wastewater. Costa JG; Paulo AMS; Amorim CL; Amaral AL; Castro PML; Ferreira EC; Mesquita DP Chemosphere; 2022 Mar; 291(Pt 2):132773. PubMed ID: 34742770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of machine learning algorithms and feature selection methods for better prediction of sludge production in a real advanced biological wastewater treatment plant. Ekinci E; Özbay B; Omurca Sİ; Sayın FE; Özbay İ J Environ Manage; 2023 Dec; 348():119448. PubMed ID: 37931437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of membrane bioreactor (MBR) and activated sludge processes in the treatment of Moroccan domestic wastewater. Kitanou S; Tahri M; Bachiri B; Mahi M; Hafsi M; Taky M; Elmidaoui A Water Sci Technol; 2018 Oct; 78(5-6):1129-1136. PubMed ID: 30339537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater through activated sludge process-a critical review. Katare AK; Tabassum A; Sharma AK; Sharma S Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Nov; 195(12):1466. PubMed ID: 37957309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Removing Organic Matter and Nutrients from Pig Farm Wastewater with a Constructed Wetland System. De La Mora-Orozco C; González-Acuña IJ; Saucedo-Terán RA; Flores-López HE; Rubio-Arias HO; Ochoa-Rivero JM Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 May; 15(5):. PubMed ID: 29883370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of chlorine disinfection on biochemical oxygen demand levels in chemically enhanced primary treatment effluent. Dai J; Jiang F; Shang C; Chau KM; Tse YK; Lee CF; Chen GH; Fang J; Zhai L Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(2):380-6. PubMed ID: 23863431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rethinking wastewater characterisation methods for activated sludge systems - a position paper. Choubert JM; Rieger L; Shaw A; Copp J; Spérandio M; Sørensen K; Rönner-Holm S; Morgenroth E; Melcer H; Gillot S Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(11):2363-73. PubMed ID: 23752367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coagulation and precipitation as post-treatment of anaerobically treated primary municipal wastewater. Diamadopoulos E; Megalou K; Georgiou M; Gizgis N Water Environ Res; 2007 Feb; 79(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 17370838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toxicity evaluation of wastewater collected at different treatment stages from a pharmaceutical industrial park wastewater treatment plant. Ma K; Qin Z; Zhao Z; Zhao C; Liang S Chemosphere; 2016 Sep; 158():163-70. PubMed ID: 27262686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability analysis of wastewater treatment plants. Oliveira SC; Von Sperling M Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(4-5):1182-94. PubMed ID: 17897694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental performance of an integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) reactor treating actual municipal wastewater during start-up phase. Singh NK; Kazmi AA; Starkl M Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(10):1840-50. PubMed ID: 26540547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Domestic wastewater treatment by real-scale electrocoagulation process. Koyuncu S; Arıman S Water Sci Technol; 2020 Feb; 81(4):656-667. PubMed ID: 32460270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]