These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Purification of leachate from sludge treatment beds by subsurface flow constructed wetlands: effects of plants and hydraulic retention time. Hu S; Chen Z; Lv Z; Chen K; Huang L; Zuo X; He J; Chen Y Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Feb; 26(6):5769-5781. PubMed ID: 30612364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Study on the effect of landfill leachate on nutrient removal from municipal wastewater. Yuan Q; Jia H; Poveda M J Environ Sci (China); 2016 May; 43():153-158. PubMed ID: 27155420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the accuracy of two simple methods for microscopic activated sludge analysis. Sobczyk M; Pajdak-Stós A; Fiałkowska E; Kocerba-Soroka W; Starzycka-Giża J; Fyda J Water Sci Technol; 2018 Dec; 78(10):2104-2112. PubMed ID: 30629538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Enhanced nitrogen removal in an anoxic-oxic-anoxic process treating low COD/N tropical wastewater: Low-dissolved oxygen nitrification and utilization of slowly-biodegradable COD for denitrification. How SW; Chua ASM; Ngoh GC; Nittami T; Curtis TP Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 693():133526. PubMed ID: 31376760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of the efficiencies of attached- versus suspended-growth SBR systems in the treatment of recycled paper mill wastewater. Muhamad MH; Sheikh Abdullah SR; Abu Hasan H; Abd Rahim RA J Environ Manage; 2015 Nov; 163():115-24. PubMed ID: 26311084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Two different purification systems at Istanbul-Tuzla and Adana-Kozan, their characterizations. Yinanç A Water Sci Technol; 2017 Jun; 75(11-12):2607-2614. PubMed ID: 28617280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sequential treatment of paper and pulp industrial wastewater: Prediction of water quality parameters by Mamdani Fuzzy Logic model and phytotoxicity assessment. Mazhar S; Ditta A; Bulgariu L; Ahmad I; Ahmed M; Nadiri AA Chemosphere; 2019 Jul; 227():256-268. PubMed ID: 30991200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Performance assessment of major wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the state of Georgia. Mines RO; Lackey LW; Behrend GR J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2006; 41(10):2175-98. PubMed ID: 17018407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Nitrogen removal from wastewater and bacterial diversity in activated sludge at different COD/N ratios and dissolved oxygen concentrations. Zielińska M; Bernat K; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska A; Sobolewska J; Wojnowska-Baryła I J Environ Sci (China); 2012; 24(6):990-8. PubMed ID: 23505865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Removal performance and water quality analysis of paper machine white water in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant. Shi S; Wang C; Fang S; Jia M; Li X Environ Technol; 2017 Jun; 38(11):1443-1451. PubMed ID: 27585225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improvement and prediction of OSA system performance in sludge reduction through integration with thermal and mechanical treatment. Nazif S; Mehrdadi N; Zare S; Mosavari S Water Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 74(9):2087-2096. PubMed ID: 27842028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A combined upflow anaerobic sludge bed and trickling biofilter process for the treatment of swine wastewater. Zhao B; Li J; Buelna G; Dubé R; Le Bihan Y Environ Technol; 2016; 37(10):1265-75. PubMed ID: 26588487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of modelling accuracy with and without exploiting automated optical monitoring information in predicting the treated wastewater quality. Tomperi J; Leiviskä K Environ Technol; 2018 Jun; 39(11):1442-1449. PubMed ID: 28504018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Model construction and application for effluent prediction in wastewater treatment plant: Data processing method optimization and process parameters integration. Wang R; Yu Y; Chen Y; Pan Z; Li X; Tan Z; Zhang J J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 302(Pt A):114020. PubMed ID: 34731713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Aerobic granules formation and simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal treating high strength ammonia wastewater in sequencing batch reactor. Wei D; Shi L; Yan T; Zhang G; Wang Y; Du B Bioresour Technol; 2014 Nov; 171():211-6. PubMed ID: 25203228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Characterization and assessment of a large-scale domestic advanced wastewater treatment plant in Turkey. Ozkan O; Oğuz M; Ozdemir O Environ Monit Assess; 2012 Sep; 184(9):5275-81. PubMed ID: 21931946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Analysis of nitrogenous and algal oxygen demand in effluent from a system of aerated lagoons followed by polishing pond. Khorsandi H; Alizadeh R; Tosinejad H; Porghaffar H Water Sci Technol; 2014; 70(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 25026585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of broken brick to enhance the removal of nutrients in subsurface flow constructed wetlands receiving hospital wastewater. Dires S; Birhanu T; Ambelu A Water Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 79(1):156-164. PubMed ID: 30816872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The H9c2(2-1) cell-based sulforhodamine B assay is a non-animal alternative to evaluate municipal wastewater quality over time. Rodrigues ET; Pereira E; Oliveira PJ; Pardal MA Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Oct; 195(11):1395. PubMed ID: 37906309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]