BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27109706)

  • 21. Effect of six degrees of freedom knee kinematics on ligament length and moment arm in an intact knee model.
    Ozada N
    Technol Health Care; 2015; 23(4):485-94. PubMed ID: 26409911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper.
    Loh JC; Fukuda Y; Tsuda E; Steadman RJ; Fu FH; Woo SL
    Arthroscopy; 2003 Mar; 19(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12627155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ACL forces and knee kinematics produced by axial tibial compression during a passive flexion-extension cycle.
    Markolf KL; Jackson SR; Foster B; McAllister DR
    J Orthop Res; 2014 Jan; 32(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 23996893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Human hip and knee torque accommodations to anterior cruciate ligament dysfunction.
    Osternig LR; Ferber R; Mercer J; Davis H
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2000 Sep; 83(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 11072776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An MRI-based method to align the compressive loading axis for human cadaveric knees.
    Martin KJ; Neu CP; Hull ML
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Dec; 129(6):855-62. PubMed ID: 18067389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Altered knee kinematics in ACL-deficient non-copers: a comparison using dynamic MRI.
    Barrance PJ; Williams GN; Snyder-Mackler L; Buchanan TS
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Feb; 24(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 16435346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cruciate coupling and screw-home mechanism in passive knee joint during extension--flexion.
    Moglo KE; Shirazi-Adl A
    J Biomech; 2005 May; 38(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 15797589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Valgus plus internal rotation moments increase anterior cruciate ligament strain more than either alone.
    Shin CS; Chaudhari AM; Andriacchi TP
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Aug; 43(8):1484-91. PubMed ID: 21266934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency alters the in vivo motion of the tibiofemoral cartilage contact points in both the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions.
    Li G; Moses JM; Papannagari R; Pathare NP; DeFrate LE; Gill TJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1826-34. PubMed ID: 16882908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measurement of the end-to-end distances between the femoral and tibial insertion sites of the anterior cruciate ligament during knee flexion and with rotational torque.
    Wang JH; Kato Y; Ingham SJ; Maeyama A; Linde-Rosen M; Smolinski P; Fu FH
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Oct; 28(10):1524-32. PubMed ID: 22717210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A biomechanical comparison of 2 femoral fixation techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: over-the-top fixation versus transphyseal technique.
    Lertwanich P; Kato Y; Martins CA; Maeyama A; Ingham SJ; Kramer S; Linde-Rosen M; Smolinski P; Fu FH
    Arthroscopy; 2011 May; 27(5):672-80. PubMed ID: 21663723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of 2 femoral tunnel locations in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study.
    Driscoll MD; Isabell GP; Conditt MA; Ismaily SK; Jupiter DC; Noble PC; Lowe WR
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Oct; 28(10):1481-9. PubMed ID: 22796141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dual-joint modeling for estimation of total knee replacement contact forces during locomotion.
    Hast MW; Piazza SJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2013 Feb; 135(2):021013. PubMed ID: 23445058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimation of in vivo ACL force changes in response to increased weightbearing.
    Hosseini A; Gill TJ; Van de Velde SK; Li G
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 May; 133(5):051004. PubMed ID: 21599095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of tibiofemoral joint kinematics on patellofemoral contact pressures under simulated muscle loads.
    Li G; DeFrate LE; Zayontz S; Park SE; Gill TJ
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):801-6. PubMed ID: 15183437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of three force-position hybrid control methods for a robot-based biological joint-testing system.
    Hsieh HJ; Hu CC; Lu TW; Lu HL; Kuo MY; Kuo CC; Hsu HC
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Jun; 15(1):62. PubMed ID: 27268070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Anteroposterior tibiofemoral displacements during isometric extension efforts. The roles of external load and knee flexion angle.
    Jurist KA; Otis JC
    Am J Sports Med; 1985; 13(4):254-8. PubMed ID: 4025677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Two-Degree-of-Freedom Knee Model Predicts Full Three-Dimensional Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Joint Motion During Functional Activity.
    Guan S; Gray HA; Thomeer LT; Pandy MG
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Mar; 51(3):493-505. PubMed ID: 36085332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Right-Left Differences in Knee Extension Stiffness for the Normal Rat Knee: In Vitro Measurements Using a New Testing Apparatus.
    Markolf KL; Evseenko D; Petrigliano F
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Apr; 138(4):044501. PubMed ID: 26863930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In Vivo Knee Contact Force Prediction Using Patient-Specific Musculoskeletal Geometry in a Segment-Based Computational Model.
    Ding Z; Nolte D; Kit Tsang C; Cleather DJ; Kedgley AE; Bull AM
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Feb; 138(2):021018. PubMed ID: 26720641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.