BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27110804)

  • 1. The Post-Amalgam Era: Norwegian Dentists' Experiences with Composite Resins and Repair of Defective Amalgam Restorations.
    Kopperud SE; Staxrud F; Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Apr; 13(4):441. PubMed ID: 27110804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland.
    Forss H; Widström E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2001 Apr; 59(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 11370750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Restorative treatment decisions on occlusal caries in Scandinavia.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB; Mejàre I; Sundberg H; Hallonsten AL
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2001 Feb; 59(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 11318041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinicians' choices of restorative materials for children.
    Tran LA; Messer LB
    Aust Dent J; 2003 Dec; 48(4):221-32. PubMed ID: 14738124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Restorative service patterns in Australia: amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer restorations.
    Brennan DS; Spencer AJ
    Int Dent J; 2003 Dec; 53(6):455-63. PubMed ID: 14725373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations.
    Palotie U; Vehkalahti MM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 19039686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE; Dahl JE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1999 Oct; 57(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 10614902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries in Norway.
    Tveit AB; Espelid I; Skodje F
    Int Dent J; 1999 Jun; 49(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 10858750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Composites and amalgam.
    Hiltunen NS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Nov; 142(11):1232-3; author reply 1233-4. PubMed ID: 22041404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults.
    Forss H; Widström E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Apr; 62(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 15198387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How dentists diagnose and treat defective restorations: evidence from the dental practice-based research network.
    Gordan VV; Garvan CW; Richman JS; Fellows JL; Rindal DB; Qvist V; Heft MW; Williams OD; Gilbert GH;
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(6):664-73. PubMed ID: 19953775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dentists' molar restoration choices and longevity: a web-based survey.
    Rosenstiel SF; Land MF; Rashid RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 15116038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom.
    Wilson NH; Burke FJ; Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 10332373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In your dental practice, is dental amalgam still the restorative material of choice?
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Aug; 133(8):1046. PubMed ID: 12198982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repair or replacement of defective restorations by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Geraldeli S; Rindal DB; Qvist V; Fellows JL; Kellum HP; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Jun; 143(6):593-601. PubMed ID: 22653939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attitudes of general dental practitioners in the UK to the use of composite materials in posterior teeth.
    Gilmour AS; Evans P; Addy LD
    Br Dent J; 2007 May; 202(12):E32. PubMed ID: 17510663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practitioner, patient and carious lesion characteristics associated with type of restorative material: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Makhija SK; Gordan VV; Gilbert GH; Litaker MS; Rindal DB; Pihlstrom DJ; Qvist V;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jun; 142(6):622-32. PubMed ID: 21628683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct restorative materials use in Australia in 2002.
    Burke FJ; McHugh S; Randall RC; Meyers IA; Pitt J; Hall AC
    Aust Dent J; 2004 Dec; 49(4):185-91. PubMed ID: 15762339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.