355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27111100)
1. Clinical significance of extraskeletal computed tomography findings on 18F-NaF PET/CT performed for osseous metastatic disease evaluation.
Guo HH; Moradi F; Iagaru A
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Sep; 37(9):975-82. PubMed ID: 27111100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Prospective Comparison of
Harmon SA; Bergvall E; Mena E; Shih JH; Adler S; McKinney Y; Mehralivand S; Citrin DE; Couvillon A; Madan RA; Gulley JL; Mease RC; Jacobs PM; Pomper MG; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Lindenberg ML
J Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1665-1671. PubMed ID: 29602821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Prospective Study Comparing
Löfgren J; Mortensen J; Rasmussen SH; Madsen C; Loft A; Hansen AE; Oturai P; Jensen KE; Mørk ML; Reichkendler M; Højgaard L; Fischer BM
J Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1778-1785. PubMed ID: 28798033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pilot prospective evaluation of 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy, 18F NaF PET/CT, 18F FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI for detection of skeletal metastases.
Iagaru A; Young P; Mittra E; Dick DW; Herfkens R; Gambhir SS
Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 38(7):e290-6. PubMed ID: 23455520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incremental Value of Cocktail 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET/CT Over 18F-FDG PET/CT Alone for Characterization of Skeletal Metastases in Breast Cancer.
Roop MJ; Singh B; Singh H; Watts A; Kohli PS; Mittal BR; Singh G
Clin Nucl Med; 2017 May; 42(5):335-340. PubMed ID: 28263210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7.
Wondergem M; van der Zant FM; Knol RJJ; Burgers AMG; Bos SD; de Jong IJ; Pruim J
World J Urol; 2018 Jan; 36(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 29043431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective evaluation of (99m)Tc MDP scintigraphy, (18)F NaF PET/CT, and (18)F FDG PET/CT for detection of skeletal metastases.
Iagaru A; Mittra E; Dick DW; Gambhir SS
Mol Imaging Biol; 2012 Apr; 14(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 21479710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of bone-seeking novel radiotracer
Passah A; Tripathi M; Ballal S; Yadav MP; Kumar R; Roesch F; Meckel M; Sarathi Chakraborty P; Bal C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 27455986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective comparative study of
Fonager RF; Zacho HD; Langkilde NC; Fledelius J; Ejlersen JA; Hendel HW; Haarmark C; Moe M; Mortensen JC; Jochumsen MR; Petersen LJ
Acta Oncol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):1063-1069. PubMed ID: 29447047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of 18F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastasis detection and its effect on patient management in patients with breast carcinoma.
Broos WAM; van der Zant FM; Wondergem M; Knol RJJ
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Apr; 39(4):325-333. PubMed ID: 29351123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Challenge of Staging Metastatic Bone Disease in the Morbidly Obese Patients: A Primary Study Evaluating the Usefulness of 18F-Sodium Fluoride (NaF) PET-CT.
Usmani S; Marafi F; Ahmed N; Esmail A; Al Kandari F; Van den Wyngaert T
Clin Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 42(11):829-836. PubMed ID: 28872551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment response evaluation with
Sachpekidis C; Hillengass J; Goldschmidt H; Wagner B; Haberkorn U; Kopka K; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 27573638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical feasibility, radiation dosimetry and clinical use of
Usmani S; Van den Wyngaert T; Ahmed N; Marafi F; Esmail A; Al Kandari F; Al Nuaimi M; Gnanasegaran G
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 32(9):594-601. PubMed ID: 30019285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unsuspected Metastases to Muscles in Osteosarcoma Detected on 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET-CT.
Usmani S; Marafi F; Rasheed R; Bakiratharajan D; Al Maraghy M; Al Kandari F
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Sep; 43(9):e343-e345. PubMed ID: 30080191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative Assessment of Early [
Harmon SA; Perk T; Lin C; Eickhoff J; Choyke PL; Dahut WL; Apolo AB; Humm JL; Larson SM; Morris MJ; Liu G; Jeraj R
J Clin Oncol; 2017 Aug; 35(24):2829-2837. PubMed ID: 28654366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The value of quantitative analysis in
Lapa P; Marques M; Costa G; Lima JP
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2017; 36(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 27793635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective comparison of whole-body bone SPECT and sodium 18F-fluoride PET in the detection of bone metastases from breast cancer.
Abikhzer G; Srour S; Fried G; Drumea K; Kozlener E; Frenkel A; Israel O; Fogelman I; Kagna O
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Nov; 37(11):1160-8. PubMed ID: 27536906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI compared with (18)F-NaF PET/CT for detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate carcinoma.
Mosavi F; Johansson S; Sandberg DT; Turesson I; Sörensen J; Ahlström H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1114-20. PubMed ID: 23096187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic bone imaging in patients with prostate cancer: patient experience and acceptance of NaF-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, whole-body MRI, and bone SPECT/CT.
Dyrberg E; Larsen EL; Hendel HW; Thomsen HS
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1119-1125. PubMed ID: 29313360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
