247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2711118)
1. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech.
Glasberg BR; Moore BC
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1989; 32():1-25. PubMed ID: 2711118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relations between perceptual measures of temporal processing, auditory-evoked brainstem responses and speech intelligibility in noise.
Papakonstantinou A; Strelcyk O; Dau T
Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):30-7. PubMed ID: 21354285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech recognition in noise, temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing.
Arlinger S; Dryselius H
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():30-7. PubMed ID: 2356736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Associations and dissociations between psychoacoustic abilities and speech perception in adolescents with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
Kishon-Rabin L; Segal O; Algom D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 52(4):956-72. PubMed ID: 19064905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impaired word recognition in noise by patients with noise-induced cochlear hearing loss: contribution of temporal resolution defect.
Phillips DP; Rappaport JM; Gulliver JM
Am J Otol; 1994 Sep; 15(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 8572072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Auditory localization and speech perception in noise. Preliminary study concerning 5 cases of perceptual deafness].
Canévet G; Santon F; Scharf B
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1986; 103(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3706968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-tone auditory suppression in younger and older normal-hearing adults and its relationship to speech perception in noise.
Sommers MS; Gehr SE
Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 264(1-2):56-62. PubMed ID: 20006694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech-in-noise perception in high-functioning individuals with autism or Asperger's syndrome.
Alcántara JI; Weisblatt EJ; Moore BC; Bolton PF
J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2004 Sep; 45(6):1107-14. PubMed ID: 15257667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech recognition threshold in noise: effects of hearing loss, frequency response, and speech materials.
Van Tasell DJ; Yanz JL
J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 3669644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bebear JP; Godey B; Robier A; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Bordure P; Mondain M; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 18832816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
Strelcyk O; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
