These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27112048)

  • 1. Bioaerosol sampling: sampling mechanisms, bioefficiency and field studies.
    Haig CW; Mackay WG; Walker JT; Williams C
    J Hosp Infect; 2016 Jul; 93(3):242-55. PubMed ID: 27112048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.
    Mbareche H; Veillette M; Bilodeau GJ; Duchaine C
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The adaptation of existing personal inhalable aerosol samplers for bioaerosol sampling.
    Kenny LC; Stancliffe JD; Crook B; Stagg S; Griffiths WD; Stewart IW; Futter SJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):831-41. PubMed ID: 9866164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Miniature PCR based portable bioaerosol monitor development.
    Agranovski IE; Usachev EV; Agranovski E; Usacheva OV
    J Appl Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 122(1):129-138. PubMed ID: 27709774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of bioaerosol samplers for the detection and quantification of influenza virus from artificial aerosols and influenza virus-infected ferrets.
    Bekking C; Yip L; Groulx N; Doggett N; Finn M; Mubareka S
    Influenza Other Respir Viruses; 2019 Nov; 13(6):564-573. PubMed ID: 31541519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive performance evaluation of six bioaerosol samplers based on an aerosol wind tunnel.
    Guo J; Lv M; Liu Z; Qin T; Qiu H; Zhang L; Lu J; Hu L; Yang W; Zhou D
    Environ Int; 2024 Jan; 183():108402. PubMed ID: 38150804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria.
    Jensen PA; Todd WF; Davis GN; Scarpino PV
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Oct; 53(10):660-7. PubMed ID: 1456208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aerobiology: Experimental Considerations, Observations, and Future Tools.
    Haddrell AE; Thomas RJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 83(17):. PubMed ID: 28667111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Passive Bioaerosol Samplers: A Complementary Tool for Bioaerosol Research. A Review.
    Manibusan S; Mainelis G
    J Aerosol Sci; 2022 Jun; 163():. PubMed ID: 36386279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology.
    Ferguson RMW; Garcia-Alcega S; Coulon F; Dumbrell AJ; Whitby C; Colbeck I
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 May; 19(3):672-690. PubMed ID: 30735594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bioaerosol sampling by a personal rotating cup sampler CIP 10-M.
    Görner P; Fabriès JF; Duquenne P; Witschger O; Wrobel R
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Jan; 8(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 16395458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Field evaluation of personal sampling methods for multiple bioaerosols.
    Wang CH; Chen BT; Han BC; Liu AC; Hung PC; Chen CY; Chao HJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120308. PubMed ID: 25799419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of airborne microbial communities using 16S ribosomal RNA: Potential bias due to air sampling stress.
    Zhen H; Krumins V; Fennell DE; Mainelis G
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 621():939-947. PubMed ID: 29079080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monitoring of bioaerosol inhalation risks in different environments using a six-stage Andersen sampler and the PCR-DGGE method.
    Xu Z; Yao M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2013 May; 185(5):3993-4003. PubMed ID: 22955887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols.
    Yao M; Mainelis G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jul; 4(7):514-24. PubMed ID: 17538812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Portable automatic bioaerosol sampling system for rapid on-site detection of targeted airborne microorganisms.
    Usachev EV; Pankova AV; Rafailova EA; Pyankov OV; Agranovski IE
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Oct; 14(10):2739-45. PubMed ID: 22951953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of air samplers and filter materials for collection and recovery of airborne norovirus.
    Uhrbrand K; Koponen IK; Schultz AC; Madsen AM
    J Appl Microbiol; 2018 Apr; 124(4):990-1000. PubMed ID: 28921812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field Performance of a Novel Passive Bioaerosol Sampler using Polarized Ferroelectric Polymer Films.
    Therkorn J; Thomas N; Scheinbeim J; Mainelis G
    Aerosol Sci Technol; 2017; 51(7):787-800. PubMed ID: 30774180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On-Site Bioaerosol Sampling and Airborne Microorganism Detection Technologies.
    Rastmanesh A; Boruah JS; Lee MS; Park S
    Biosensors (Basel); 2024 Feb; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 38534229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High fidelity recovery of airborne microbial genetic materials by direct condensation capture into genomic preservatives.
    Nieto-Caballero M; Savage N; Keady P; Hernandez M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Feb; 157():1-3. PubMed ID: 30557586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.