These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27112413)

  • 1. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies.
    González de Villaumbrosia P; Martínez-Rus F; García-Orejas A; Salido MP; Pradíes G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):543-550.e1. PubMed ID: 27112413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.
    Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners.
    Lee JJ; Jeong ID; Park JY; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):253-259. PubMed ID: 27666500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of eight extraoral laboratory scanners with a complete-arch model: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Emir F; Ayyıldız S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Oct; 63(4):434-439. PubMed ID: 30954395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided analysis of digital dental impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral scanners.
    Bohner LOL; De Luca Canto G; Marció BS; Laganá DC; Sesma N; Tortamano Neto P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):617-623. PubMed ID: 28385434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation.
    Kim RJ; Park JM; Shim JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):895-903.e1. PubMed ID: 30006228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners.
    Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vivo study of different scanning devices.
    Kernen F; Schlager S; Seidel Alvarez V; Mehrhof J; Vach K; Kohal R; Nelson K; Flügge T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 33902891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of manufacturing technologies on the surface accuracy of CAD-CAM occlusal splints.
    Orgev A; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):697-705. PubMed ID: 36227731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trueness of CAD/CAM digitization with a desktop scanner - an in vitro study.
    Joós-Kovács G; Vecsei B; Körmendi S; Gyarmathy VA; Borbély J; Hermann P
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Dec; 19(1):280. PubMed ID: 31830970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan.
    Park GH; Son K; Lee KB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 30598314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bias Evaluation of the Accuracy of Two Extraoral Scanners and an Intraoral Scanner Based on ADA Standards.
    Cui N; Wang J; Hou X; Sun S; Huang Q; Lim HK; Cai H; Jia Q; Lee ES; Jiang HB
    Scanning; 2021; 2021():5535403. PubMed ID: 34221213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.
    Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scanning accuracy of nondental structured light extraoral scanners compared with that of a dental-specific scanner.
    Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Jiménez-Martínez MJ; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):110-114. PubMed ID: 32665118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 3-dimensional accuracy analysis of chairside CAD/CAM milling processes.
    Bosch G; Ender A; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1425-31. PubMed ID: 24993373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the accuracy of direct and indirect three-dimensional digitizing processes for CAD/CAM systems - An in vitro study.
    Vecsei B; Joós-Kovács G; Borbély J; Hermann P
    J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Apr; 61(2):177-184. PubMed ID: 27461088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
    Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols.
    Peng L; Chen L; Harris BT; Bhandari B; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 29703675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-Dimensional Static Articulation Accuracy of Virtual Models - Part I: System Trueness and Precision.
    Yee SHX; Esguerra RJ; Chew AAQ; Wong KM; Tan KBC
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 29235202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.