326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27113424)
1. Sensory change of the reconstructed breast envelope after skin-sparing mastectomy.
Khan A; Zhang J; Sollazzo V; Mohammed K; Gui G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 42(7):973-9. PubMed ID: 27113424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient Satisfaction and Nipple-Areola Sensitivity After Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction in a High Breast Cancer Risk Population: Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy.
van Verschuer VM; Mureau MA; Gopie JP; Vos EL; Verhoef C; Menke-Pluijmers MB; Koppert LB
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Aug; 77(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26076217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective evaluation of skin and nipple-areola sensation and patient satisfaction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Dossett LA; Lowe J; Sun W; Lee MC; Smith PD; Jacobsen PB; Laronga C
J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 114(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 27087574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Sensation on Mastectomy Skin Flaps following Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Akdeniz Dogan Z; Farhadi J
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2020 Jul; 36(6):420-425. PubMed ID: 32088917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast sensibility after bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study.
Gahm J; Hansson P; Brandberg Y; Wickman M
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1521-7. PubMed ID: 23953096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast reconstruction following subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer: a critical appraisal of the nipple-areola complex.
Nahabedian MY; Tsangaris TN
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Apr; 117(4):1083-90. PubMed ID: 16582769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The lateral inframammary fold incision for nipple-sparing mastectomy: outcomes from over 50 immediate implant-based breast reconstructions.
Blechman KM; Karp NS; Levovitz C; Guth AA; Axelrod DM; Shapiro RL; Choi M
Breast J; 2013; 19(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 23252505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recovery of sensation in immediate breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps after breast-conservative surgery and skin-sparing mastectomy.
Tomita K; Yano K; Hosokawa K
Ann Plast Surg; 2011 Apr; 66(4):334-8. PubMed ID: 21346536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study.
Djohan R; Gage E; Gatherwright J; Pavri S; Firouz J; Bernard S; Yetman R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Mar; 125(3):818-29. PubMed ID: 20195110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Improves Long-Term Nipple But Not Skin Sensation After Breast Reconstruction: Quantification of Long-Term Sensation in Nipple Sparing Versus Non-nipple Sparing Mastectomy.
Rodriguez-Unda NA; Bello RJ; Clarke-Pearson EM; Sanyal A; Cooney CM; Manahan MA; Rosson GD
Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Jun; 78(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 27759590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Touch sensibility in the breast after subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with a prosthesis.
Benediktsson KP; Perbeck L; Geigant E; Solders G
Br J Plast Surg; 1997 Sep; 50(6):443-9. PubMed ID: 9326148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct neurotization of free nipple grafts with cadaveric nerve grafts following mastectomy for gender affirming surgery.
Loughran AM; Hopkins JM; Kidney-Hilt E; Doshi K; Keith J
Microsurgery; 2024 May; 44(4):e31174. PubMed ID: 38553861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the sensitivity of skin-sparing mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy superior to conventional mastectomy with innervated flap?
Mori H; Okazaki M
Microsurgery; 2011 Sep; 31(6):428-33. PubMed ID: 21503979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skin-sparing mastectomy.
Cunnick GH; Mokbel K
Am J Surg; 2004 Jul; 188(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 15219490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitation of breast sensibility following reduction mammaplasty: a comparison of inferior and medial pedicle techniques.
Mofid MM; Dellon AL; Elias JJ; Nahabedian MY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jun; 109(7):2283-8. PubMed ID: 12045551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation into the possible cause of subjective decreased sensory perception in the nipple-areola complex of women with macromastia.
Godwin Y; Valassiadou K; Lewis S; Denley H
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 May; 113(6):1598-606. PubMed ID: 15114119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oncological safety and outcomes of nipple-sparing mastectomy with breast reconstruction: a single-centered experience in Taiwan.
Ou KW; Yu JC; Ho MH; Chiu WK; Ou KL; Chen TM; Chen SG
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 May; 74 Suppl 2():S127-31. PubMed ID: 25882533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast sensitivity after mastectomy and autologous reconstruction.
Heine N; Koch C; Brebant V; Kehrer A; Anker A; Prantl L
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 67(3-4):459-465. PubMed ID: 28885214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postoperative pain assessment of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prepectoral prosthesis breast reconstruction: a comparison with conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Moon J; Lee J; Lee DW; Lee HS; Nam DJ; Kim MJ; Kim NY; Park HS
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(11):2409-2416. PubMed ID: 33967619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy - a Swedish matched cohort study.
Adam H; Bygdeson M; de Boniface J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1209-15. PubMed ID: 25186915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
