BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27113512)

  • 1. Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Number of Nodes Examined and Optimal Lymph Node Prognostic Scheme.
    Bagante F; Tran T; Spolverato G; Ruzzenente A; Buttner S; Ethun CG; Groot Koerkamp B; Conci S; Idrees K; Isom CA; Fields RC; Krasnick B; Weber SM; Salem A; Martin RC; Scoggins C; Shen P; Mogal HD; Schmidt C; Beal E; Hatzaras I; Vitiello G; IJzermans JN; Maithel SK; Poultsides G; Guglielmi A; Pawlik TM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2016 May; 222(5):750-759.e2. PubMed ID: 27113512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is the most accurate lymph node staging method for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? Comparison of UICC/AJCC pN stage, number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes.
    Conci S; Ruzzenente A; Sandri M; Bertuzzo F; Campagnaro T; Bagante F; Capelli P; D'Onofrio M; Piccino M; Dorna AE; Pedrazzani C; Iacono C; Guglielmi A
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):743-750. PubMed ID: 28094085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lymph node dissection in resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review.
    Kambakamba P; Linecker M; Slankamenac K; DeOliveira ML
    Am J Surg; 2015 Oct; 210(4):694-701. PubMed ID: 26212390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Defining an Optimal Prognostic Lymph Node Stratification Schema.
    Kim Y; Spolverato G; Amini N; Margonis GA; Gupta R; Ejaz A; Pawlik TM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 22(8):2772-8. PubMed ID: 25663595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Application value of different lymph node staging system in predicting prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma].
    Chen C; Wu YH; Li Q; Wu H; Qiu YH; Song TQ; Mao XH; He Y; Cheng Z; Zhai WL; Li JD; Geng ZM; Tang ZH
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 58(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 32241060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic Performance of Different Lymph Node Staging Systems After Curative Intent Resection for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.
    Spolverato G; Ejaz A; Kim Y; Squires MH; Poultsides G; Fields RC; Bloomston M; Weber SM; Votanopoulos K; Acher AW; Jin LX; Hawkins WG; Schmidt C; Kooby DA; Worhunsky D; Saunders N; Cho CS; Levine EA; Maithel SK; Pawlik TM
    Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):991-8. PubMed ID: 25563867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of nodal status for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: location, number, or ratio of involved nodes.
    Aoba T; Ebata T; Yokoyama Y; Igami T; Sugawara G; Takahashi Y; Nimura Y; Nagino M
    Ann Surg; 2013 Apr; 257(4):718-25. PubMed ID: 23407295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Four Lymph Node Classifications for the Prediction of Survival in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.
    Liu ZP; Zhang QY; Chen WY; Huang YY; Zhang YQ; Gong Y; Jiang Y; Bai J; Chen ZY; Dai HS
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2022 May; 26(5):1030-1040. PubMed ID: 34973138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the Lymph Node Status in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: the New Eighth Edition AJCC Staging System.
    Bagante F; Spolverato G; Weiss M; Alexandrescu S; Marques HP; Aldrighetti L; Maithel SK; Pulitano C; Bauer TW; Shen F; Poultsides GA; Soubrane O; Martel G; Groot Koerkamp B; Guglielmi A; Itaru E; Pawlik TM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Jan; 22(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 28424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection.
    Sun Z; Xu Y; Li de M; Wang ZN; Zhu GL; Huang BJ; Li K; Xu HM
    Cancer; 2010 Jun; 116(11):2571-80. PubMed ID: 20336791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nodal status, number of lymph nodes examined, and lymph node ratio: what defines prognosis after resection of colon adenocarcinoma?
    Gleisner AL; Mogal H; Dodson R; Efron J; Gearhart S; Wick E; Lidor A; Herman JM; Pawlik TM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Dec; 217(6):1090-100. PubMed ID: 24045143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association of Lymph Node Status With Survival in Patients After Liver Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma in an Italian Multicenter Analysis.
    Giuliante F; Ardito F; Guglielmi A; Aldrighetti L; Ferrero A; Calise F; Giulini SM; Jovine E; Breccia C; De Rose AM; Pinna AD; Nuzzo G
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Oct; 151(10):916-922. PubMed ID: 27556741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ of the bile duct margin in patients with surgically resected node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is associated with poor survival: a retrospective study.
    Higuchi R; Yazawa T; Uemura S; Izumo W; Furukawa T; Yamamoto M
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2017 Aug; 24(8):456-465. PubMed ID: 28547855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of different lymph node staging schemes in prostate cancer patients with lymph node metastasis.
    Jin S; Wang J; Shen Y; Gan H; Xu P; Wei Y; Wei J; Wu J; Wang B; Wang J; Yang C; Zhu Y; Ye D
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2020 Jan; 52(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 31552575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concomitant hepatic artery resection for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a case-control study with propensity score matching.
    Noji T; Tsuchikawa T; Okamura K; Tanaka K; Nakanishi Y; Asano T; Nakamura T; Shichinohe T; Hirano S
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2016 Jul; 23(7):442-8. PubMed ID: 27207604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adequate lymph node assessment for extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma.
    Ito K; Ito H; Allen PJ; Gonen M; Klimstra D; D'Angelica MI; Fong Y; DeMatteo RP; Brennan MF; Blumgart LH; Jarnagin WR
    Ann Surg; 2010 Apr; 251(4):675-81. PubMed ID: 20224368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic value of lymphadenectomy in node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter, retrospectively study.
    Chen C; Su J; Wu H; Qiu Y; Song T; Mao X; He Y; Cheng Z; Zhai W; Li J; Geng Z; Tang Z
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Apr; 49(4):780-787. PubMed ID: 36404249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic value of retrieved lymph node counts in patients with node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinomas.
    Lin H; Wu YS; Li Z; Jiang Y
    ANZ J Surg; 2018 Dec; 88(12):E829-E834. PubMed ID: 30207026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Predicts Survival in Patients After Resection for Esophageal Cancer.
    Cao J; Yuan P; Ma H; Ye P; Wang Y; Yuan X; Bao F; Lv W; Hu J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 102(2):424-32. PubMed ID: 27180928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rational Extent of Regional Lymphadenectomy and the Prognostic Impact of the Number of Positive Lymph Nodes for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.
    Sakata J; Takizawa K; Miura K; Hirose Y; Muneoka Y; Tajima Y; Ichikawa H; Shimada Y; Kobayashi T; Wakai T
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 30(7):4306-4317. PubMed ID: 36991167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.