405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27113881)
1. Biometry with a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer: Repeatability and agreement with an optical low-coherence reflectometry device.
Kurian M; Negalur N; Das S; Puttaiah NK; Haria D; J TS; Thakkar MM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Apr; 42(4):577-81. PubMed ID: 27113881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer.
Shammas HJ; Ortiz S; Shammas MC; Kim SH; Chong C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26948778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry.
Kunert KS; Peter M; Blum M; Haigis W; Sekundo W; Schütze J; Büehren T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry.
Hoffer KJ; Hoffmann PC; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 27531293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of 2 swept-source OCT biometers and 1 optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
Fişuş AD; Hirnschall ND; Ruiss M; Pilwachs C; Georgiev S; Findl O
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1302-1307. PubMed ID: 33770018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement agreement between a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry and a validated biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry.
Li J; Chen H; Savini G; Lu W; Yu X; Bao F; Wang Q; Huang J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 26948780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster.
Huang J; Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Chen H; Lu W; Hu Q; Bao F; Wang Q
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):493-498. PubMed ID: 27503393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer.
Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Rozema JJ; Przewłócka K; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 31706516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients.
Goebels S; Pattmöller M; Eppig T; Cayless A; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26703487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of a new Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometer and a low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
Ruiz-Mesa R; Abengózar-Vela A; Ruiz-Santos M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1406-1412. PubMed ID: 29223229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability of a fully automated swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer and agreement with a low coherence reflectometry biometer.
Domínguez-Vicent A; Venkataraman AP; Dalin A; Brautaset R; Montés-Micó R
Eye Vis (Lond); 2023 Jun; 10(1):24. PubMed ID: 37264436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Axial length measurements: Comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer and partial coherence interferometry in myopia.
Yang JY; Kim HK; Kim SS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Mar; 43(3):328-332. PubMed ID: 28410713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeatability and Agreement of a Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometer IOLMaster 700 Versus a Scheimpflug Imaging-Based Biometer AL-Scan in Cataract Patients.
Chan TCY; Wan KH; Tang FY; Wang YM; Yu M; Cheung C
Eye Contact Lens; 2020 Jan; 46(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 30985487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometry Devices in Dense Cataracts.
Vasavada SA; Patel P; Vaishnav VR; Ashena Z; Srivastava S; Vasavada V; Nanavaty MA
J Refract Surg; 2020 Aug; 36(8):557-564. PubMed ID: 32785730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability of new optical biometer and agreement with 2 validated optical biometers, all based on SS-OCT.
Galzignato A; Lupardi E; Hoffer KJ; Barboni P; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Jan; 49(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 36026703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of 2 biometers using swept-source OCT technology.
Panthier C; Rouger H; Gozlan Y; Moran S; Gatinel D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Jan; 48(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 34034291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with Optical Low-coherence Reflectometry and Partial-coherence Interferometry Optical Biometers.
Can E; Duran M; Çetinkaya T; Arıtürk N
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2016; 23(4):288-292. PubMed ID: 27994390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repeatability and reproducibility of a new fully automatic measurement optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and agreement with swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer.
Yu J; Zhao G; Lei CS; Wan T; Ning R; Xing W; Ma X; Pan H; Savini G; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Zhou X; Huang J
Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 108(5):673-678. PubMed ID: 37142332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of a new swept-source optical biometer with a partial coherence interferometry.
Lee HK; Kim MK
BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):269. PubMed ID: 30340561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
