These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27115071)

  • 1. Different relationships between central dopamine system and sub-processes of inhibition: Spontaneous eye blink rate relates with N2 but not P3 in a Go/Nogo task.
    Zhang T; Wang C; Tan F; Mou D; Zheng L; Chen A
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Jun; 105():95-103. PubMed ID: 27115071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The interaction effect between dopamine and task difficulty: Spontaneous eye blink rates diversely relate with Nogo-N2 across various task difficulties.
    Zhang T; Yu L; Han X
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Apr; 150():1-10. PubMed ID: 31996297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time course of automatic emotion regulation during a facial Go/Nogo task.
    Zhang W; Lu J
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Feb; 89(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 22200654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex differences in equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: effects on N2 and P3.
    Melynyte S; Ruksenas O; Griskova-Bulanova I
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1565-1574. PubMed ID: 28258436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The developmental relationship between central dopaminergic level and response inhibition from late childhood to young adulthood.
    Zhang T; Zhang Q; Wang C; Chen A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Jun; 116():53-59. PubMed ID: 28219681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. N2 and P3 modulation during partial inhibition in a modified go/nogo task.
    Nguyen AT; Moyle JJ; Fox AM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Sep; 107():63-71. PubMed ID: 27394185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship of N2 and P3 to inhibitory processing of social drinkers in a Go/NoGo task.
    Oddy BW; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jun; 72(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 19250950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of age on cognitive control during semantic categorization.
    Mudar RA; Chiang HS; Maguire MJ; Spence JS; Eroh J; Kraut MA; Hart J
    Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():285-93. PubMed ID: 25823764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of age on N2 and P3 components: A meta-analysis of Go/Nogo tasks.
    Cheng CH; Tsai HY; Cheng HN
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103574. PubMed ID: 31200173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
    Jia H; Li H; Yu D
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the use of event-related potentials to auditory stimuli in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Douglas KM
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Sep; 193(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 21764566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of amnestic mild cognitive impairment on N2 and P3 Go/NoGo ERP components.
    Cid-Fernández S; Lindín M; Díaz F
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2014; 38(2):295-306. PubMed ID: 23963292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The development of automatic emotion regulation in an implicit emotional Go/NoGo paradigm and the association with depressive symptoms and anhedonia during adolescence.
    Zhang W; Ding Q; Chen N; Wei Q; Zhao C; Zhang P; Li X; Liu Q; Li H
    Neuroimage Clin; 2016; 11():116-123. PubMed ID: 26937379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Executive control in obsessive-compulsive disorder: event-related potentials in a Go/Nogo task.
    Ruchsow M; Reuter K; Hermle L; Ebert D; Kiefer M; Falkenstein M
    J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2007; 114(12):1595-601. PubMed ID: 17610122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrophysiological correlates of behavioral response inhibition in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Kim MS; Kim YY; Yoo SY; Kwon JS
    Depress Anxiety; 2007; 24(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 16933318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task.
    Randall WM; Smith JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 122(12):2400-7. PubMed ID: 21715225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.