BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27115243)

  • 21. Evaluation of Medial Olivocochlear Neural Efferent Pathway in Tinnitus Perception in Normal-hearing Individuals.
    Tayade A; Tucker D
    Int Tinnitus J; 2022 Jun; 26(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 35861455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of coffee on contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Srivastava I; Kalaiah MK; Roushan R; Shastri U; Kumar K
    F1000Res; 2022; 11():878. PubMed ID: 37841827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Concurrent measures of contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and of auditory steady-state responses.
    Mertes IB; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):2027. PubMed ID: 27914370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Delay and temporal integration in medial olivocochlear bundle activation in humans.
    Maison S; Durrant J; Gallineau C; Micheyl C; Collet L
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 11271977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contralateral suppression of linear and nonlinear transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates at risk for hearing loss.
    Durante AS; Carvallo RM
    J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 17585930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantitative analysis of cochlear active mechanisms in tinnitus subjects with normal hearing sensitivity: multiparametric recording of evoked otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression.
    Paglialonga A; Del Bo L; Ravazzani P; Tognola G
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Jun; 37(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 19879078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does the Presence of Spontaneous Components Affect the Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions?
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):990-1005. PubMed ID: 33480622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Influence of Efferent Inhibition on Speech Perception in Noise: A Revisit Through Its Level-Dependent Function.
    Yashaswini L; Maruthy S
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 28(2S):508-515. PubMed ID: 31461336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.
    Putterman DB; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Garinis AC; Fitzpatrick DF; McMillan GP; Feeney MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28437273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Standardization of the TEOAE Contralateral Suppression Test in Terms of Stimulus Intensity and Contralateral Noise Duration in Individuals with Normal Hearing.
    Celikgun B; Derinsu U
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 35512841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Effect of Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Level on the Strength and Detectability of the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
    Lewis JD
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1391-1403. PubMed ID: 30896525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lack of correlation between medial olivocochlear reflex strength and sentence recognition in noise.
    Mertes IB; Stutz AL
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Feb; 62(2):110-117. PubMed ID: 35195043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in children. pure tone 1.0 kHz and 2.0 kHz suppressive effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission.
    Morawski K; Namyslowski G; Kossowska I; Lisowska G; Urbaniec P
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):112-5. PubMed ID: 11318438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects.
    Hood LJ; Berlin CI; Hurley A; Cecola RP; Bell B
    Hear Res; 1996 Nov; 101(1-2):113-8. PubMed ID: 8951438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Contralateral modification of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
    Ganz M; von Specht H; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 9280414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Heightened OAEs in young adult musicians: Influence of current noise exposure and training recency.
    Main M; Skoe E
    Hear Res; 2024 Feb; 442():108925. PubMed ID: 38141520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay.
    Mishra SK; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 23739244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with cerebello-pontine angle tumor.
    Ferguson MA; O'Donoghue GM; Owen V
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 11409853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in neonates.
    Durante AS; Carvalho RM
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Jun; 41(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 12154810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.